Ethics and International Affairs 21 (4):451-469 (2007)

Abstract
This article claims that it is not mutual benefit but mutual risk that grounds compatriot preference. Exposure to risks such as state abuse provide us with a reason to take our compatriots' interests seriously. The same argument, however, displays the limits of this reasoning, and also grounds a demanding obligation to aid other societies.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2007.00118.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,342
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Many, Not the Few: Pluralism About Global Distributive Justice.Helena de Bres - 2012 - Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (3):314-340.
Is There a Global Harm Principle?Richard Vernon - 2009 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (1):1-18.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Liberal Defence of (Some) Duties to Compatriots.Seth Lazar - 2010 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 27 (3):246-257.
Does Obligation Diminish with Distance?Gillian Brock - 2005 - Ethics, Place and Environment 8 (1):3 – 20.
Die moralische Bedeutung politischer Grenzen.Frank Dietrich - 2003 - Analyse & Kritik 25 (2):248-258.
Risk-Benefit Analysis: From a Logical Point of View. [REVIEW]Georg Spielthenner - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (2):161-170.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
32 ( #299,978 of 2,326,062 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #284,939 of 2,326,062 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes