The Structure of Sensorimotor Explanation

Synthese (forthcoming)
The sensorimotor theory of vision and visual consciousness is often described as a radical alternative to the computational and connectionist orthodoxy in the study of visual perception. However, it is far from clear whether the theory represents a significant departure from orthodox approaches or whether it is an enrichment of it. In this study, I tackle this issue by focusing on the explanatory structure of the sensorimotor theory. I argue that the standard formulation of the theory subscribes to the same theses of the dynamical hypothesis and that it affords covering-law explanations. This however exposes the theory to the mere description worry and generates a puzzle about the role of representations. I then argue that the sensorimotor theory is compatible with a mechanistic framework, and show how this can overcome the mere description worry and solve the problem of the explanatory role of representations. By doing so, it will be shown that the theory should be understood as an enrichment of the orthodoxy, rather than an alternative.
Keywords Sensorimotor theory  Mechanisms  Explanation  Dynamic System Theory  Philosophy of Perception  Mere Description Worry
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11229-017-1664-9
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Thinking About Mechanisms.Peter K. Machamer, Lindley Darden & Carl F. Craver - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (1):1-25.
Explanation: A Mechanist Alternative.William Bechtel - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Biol and Biomed Sci 36 (2):421--441.
A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness.J. Kevin O'Regan & Alva Noë - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):883-917.
On the Proper Treatment of Connectionism.Paul Smolensky - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (1):1-23.

View all 72 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Violations of Sensorimotor Theories of Visual Experience.Bruce Bridgeman - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):904-905.
The Phenomenology of Sensorimotor Understanding.Ken Pepper - 2014 - In John Mark Bishop & Andrew Owen Martin (eds.), Contemporary Sensorimotor Theory. Springer. pp. 53-65.
Framing Visual Perception in Terms of Sensorimotor Mapping.Silvano Zipoli Caiani - 2014 - Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 9 (1).
Representationalism and the Sensorimotor Theory.D. Silverman - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):282-284.
A New Imagery Debate: Enactive and Sensorimotor Accounts.Lucia Foglia & J. Kevin O’Regan - 2016 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (1):181-196.
Understanding 'Sensorimotor Understanding'.Tom Roberts - 2010 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (1):101-111.
The Sensorimotor Theory of Cognition.Natika Newton - 1993 - Pragmatics and Cognitionpragmatics and Cognition 1 (2):267-305.
Three Experiments to Test the Sensorimotor Theory of Vision.Susan J. Blackmore - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):977-977.
Sensorimotor Direct Realism: How We Enact Our World.M. Beaton - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (2):265-276.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
94 ( #60,495 of 2,214,489 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
94 ( #2,065 of 2,214,489 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature