Philosophy Compass 5 (8):645-655 (2010)

David Vessey
Grand Valley State University
Gadamer sought to distinguish his philosophical hermeneutics from theologically driven hermeneutics. Perhaps because of that, even though he has influenced contemporary theological hermeneutics, he has very little to say about theology or religion. What he does say about religion is drawn from a reductive interpretation of religion as myths meant that posit something transcendent to help us cope with our awareness of our death. Here I explain why he thought Christianity was such a paradoxical religion, how his views might be useful for philosophers of religion and how they have been useful for theologians. I end with a critical discussion of Nicholas Wolterstorff's interpretation of Gadamer's views.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00311.x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,018
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Gadamer, Barth, and Transcendence in Biblical Interpretation.Darren Sarisky - 2021 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (4).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
89 ( #129,347 of 2,498,519 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #211,850 of 2,498,519 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes