I consider metaethics to be a sub-branch of moral philosophy. Some of the most central questions in metaethical inquiry include the following: What are the natures of the meanings of moral terms? If there are such things as moral properties (rightness, wrongness, goodness, badness, etc.), what are their natures?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Purpose of Analysis in Moore's Principia Ethica.Eivind Storheim - 1966 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 9 (1-4):156 – 170.
Review: Should Moore Have Followed His Own Method? [REVIEW]Daniel Stoljar - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 129 (3):609 - 618.
Scanlon Versus Moore on Goodness.Philip Stratton-Lake & Brad Hooker - 2006 - In Terry Horgan & Mark Timmons (eds.), Metaethics After Moore. Oxford University Press. pp. 149.
Knowing Enough to Disagree: A New Response to the Moral Twin Earth Argument.Mark van Roojen - 2006 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 1. Clarendon Press. pp. 161-94.
Singer, Moore, and the Metaphysics of Morals.Jack Temkin - 1984 - Philosophy Research Archives 10:567-571.
III. Morals, Moore, and Maclntyre.Stephen R. L. Clark - 1983 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (4):425 – 445.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads10 ( #435,665 of 2,178,176 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?