Philosophical Studies 173 (10):2681-2700 (2016)

Authors
Barbara Vetter
Freie Universität Berlin
Abstract
Dispositionalists try to provide an account of modality—possibility, necessity, and the counterfactual conditional—in terms of dispositions. But there may be a tension between dispositionalist accounts of possibility on the one hand, and of counterfactuals on the other. Dispositionalists about possibility must hold that there are no impossible dispositions, i.e., dispositions with metaphysically impossible stimulus and/or manifestation conditions; dispositionalist accounts of counterfactuals, if they allow for non-vacuous counterpossibles, require that there are such impossible dispositions. I argue, first, that there are in fact no impossible dispositions; and second, that the dispositionalist can nevertheless acknowledge the non-vacuity of some counterpossibles. The strategy in the second part is one of ‘divide and conquer’ that is not confined to the dispositionalist: it consists in arguing that counterpossibles, when non-vacuous, are read epistemically and are therefore outside the purview of a dispositional account.
Keywords Dispositions  Modality  Counterpossibles  Dispositionalism  Epistemic modality
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11098-016-0671-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Upload history
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Writing the Book of the World.Theodore Sider - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Nature’s Metaphysics.Alexander Bird - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Powers: A Study in Metaphysics.George Molnar (ed.) - 2003 - Oxford University Press.

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Counteridenticals.Alexander W. Kocurek - 2018 - The Philosophical Review 127 (3):323-369.
Williamsonian Modal Epistemology, Possibility-Based.Barbara Vetter - 2016 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 46 (4-5):766-795.
Can Hardcore Actualism Validate S5?Samuel Kimpton‐Nye - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Defining Qualitative Properties.Vera Hoffmann-Kolss - 2019 - Erkenntnis 84 (5):995-1010.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Alternative Frameworks and Counterpossibles.Maciej Sendłak - 2016 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 93 (1):24-41.
Counterpossibles.Barak Krakauer - 2012 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts
Omission Impossible.Sara Bernstein - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (10):2575-2589.
Remarks on Counterpossibles.Berit Brogaard & Joe Salerno - 2013 - Synthese 190 (4):639-660.
Colors, Dispositions, and Similarity.Adam Wager - 2016 - Erkenntnis 81 (2):335-347.
On Counterpossibles.Jens Christian Bjerring - 2013 - Philosophical Studies (2):1-27.
Counteressential Conditionals.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2016 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 5 (1):73-81.
The Problem of Counterpossibles.Daniel H. Cohen - 1987 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29 (1):91-101.
Zagzebski and Interesting Counterpossibles.Richard Brian Davis - 1997 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 71:125-136.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-04-03

Total views
414 ( #15,011 of 2,330,639 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #11,316 of 2,330,639 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes