Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (9):536-539 (2005)
The Italian parliament passed the law on assisted reproduction after a heated debate. The promulgation of this law (Law 40/2004) is the end point of a long and troubled journey that has seen many bills come and go, all of which have failed. The law consists of a whole set of regulations that will have a great impact on health and on society in general. The law is against many of the technical practices of assisted reproduction; several such practices are banned. This paper outlines ethical and medicolegal issues arising in connection with the law. The law states that no more than three embryos must be created at any one time and all the embryos created must be transferred together even if the couple does not need all the embryos. Embryo cryopreservation is also forbidden, as is assisted reproductive technology (ART), which uses a third party in any way, and the screening of embryos for genetic defects
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Biomedicine, the Family, and Human Rights.Marie Thérèse Meulders-Klein, Ruth Deech & P. Vlaardingerbroek (eds.) - 2002 - Kluwer Law International.
Legal Conceptions: The Evolving Law and Policy of Assisted Reproductive Technologies.Susan L. Crockin - 2010 - Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ethical and Legal Aspects in Medically Assisted Human Reproduction in Romania.Beatrice Ioan & Vasile Astarastoae - 2008 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 14 (2):4-13.
International Survey of Laws on Assisted Procreation.Jan Stepan (ed.) - 1990 - Schulthess Polygraphischer Verlag.
Perfecting Pregnancy: Law, Disability, and the Future of Reproduction.Isabel Karpin - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
Life, Technology, and Law: Second Forum for Transnational and Comparative Legal Dialogue, Levico Terme, Italy, June 9-10, 2006: Proceedings. [REVIEW]Carlo Casonato (ed.) - 2007 - Cedam.
Freedom and Responsibility in Reproductive Choice.John R. Spencer & Antje Du Bois-Pedain (eds.) - 2006 - Hart.
Third Party Assisted Conception: An African Perspective.Godfrey B. Tangwa - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (5):297-306.
Assisted Reproduction: Managing an Unruly Technology. [REVIEW]Mairi Levitt - 2004 - Health Care Analysis 12 (1):41-49.
Law, Human Agency, and Autonomic Computing: The Philosophy of Law Meets the Philosophy of Technology.Mireille Hildebrandt & Antoinette Rouvroy (eds.) - 2011 - Routledge.
Drawing a Line Between Killing and Letting Die: The Law, and Law Reform, on Medically Assisted Dying.Lawrence O. Gostin - 1993 - Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 21 (1):94-101.
Gender, Infertility, Motherhood, and Assisted Reproductive Technology in Turkey.Serap Sahinoglu & Nuket Buken - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (2):218-232.
Is Age the Limit for Human-Assisted Reproduction Techniques? 'Yes', Said an Italian Judge.M. Gulino, A. Pacchiarotti, G. Montanari Vergallo & P. Frati - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (4):250-252.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads10 ( #423,495 of 2,152,440 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,788 of 2,152,440 )
How can I increase my downloads?