Hypatia 12 (2):185 - 215 (1997)
Abstract |
Within recent feminist philosophy, controversy has developed over the desirability, and indeed, the possibility of defining the central terms of its analysis-"woman," "femininity," etc. The controversy results largely from the undertheorization of the notion of definition; feminists have uncritically adopted an Aristotelian treatment of definition as entailing metaphysical, rather than merely linguistic, commitments. A "discursive" approach to definition, by contrast, allows us to define our terms, while avoiding the dangers of essentialism and universalism
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1997.tb00026.x |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical investigations.Ludwig Wittgenstein & G. E. M. Anscombe - 1953 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 161:124-124.
View all 45 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
A Diagram of Definition: The Defining of Definition.Alexander Matthews - 1998 - Assen, Netherlands: Van Gorcum.
Defining Mental Disorder. Exploring the 'Natural Function' Approach.Somogy Varga - 2011 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 6:1-.
Incomprehensibility: The Role of the Concept in DSM-IV Definition of Schizophrenic Delusions.Markus Heinimaa - 2002 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (3):291-295.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-08-10
Total views
60 ( #190,053 of 2,506,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,268 of 2,506,037 )
2010-08-10
Total views
60 ( #190,053 of 2,506,037 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #277,268 of 2,506,037 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads