Mind and Language 20 (5):537–558 (2005)

Authors
Fernando Martinez-Manrique
Universidad de Granada
Agustin Vicente
University of the Basque Country
Abstract
According to the thesis of semantic underdetermination, most sentences of a natural language lack a definite semantic interpretation. This thesis supports an argument against the use of natural language as an instrument of thought, based on the premise that cognition requires a semantically precise and compositional instrument. In this paper we examine several ways to construe this argument, as well as possible ways out for the cognitive view of natural language in the introspectivist version defended by Carruthers. Finally, we sketch a view of the role of language in thought as a specialized tool, showing how it avoids the consequences of semantic underdetermination.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.0268-1064.2005.00299.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Language of Thought.Jerry A. Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.
The Language Instinct.Steven Pinker - 1994/2007 - Harper Perennial.

View all 43 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
572 ( #9,731 of 2,385,941 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #24,387 of 2,385,941 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes