Metaphilosophy 43 (3):306-347 (2012)
Philosophy lacks criteria to evaluate its philosophical theories. To fill this gap, this essay introduces nine criteria to compare worldviews, classified in three broad categories: objective criteria (objective consistency, scientificity, scope), subjective criteria (subjective consistency, personal utility, emotionality), and intersubjective criteria (intersubjective consistency, collective utility, narrativity). The essay first defines what a worldview is and exposes the heuristic used in the quest for criteria. After describing each criterion individually, it shows what happens when each of them is violated. From the criteria, it derives assessment tests to compare and improve different worldviews. These include the is-ought, ought-act, and is-act first-order tests; the critical and dialectical second-order tests; the mixed-questions and first-second-order third-order tests; and the we-I, we-it, and it-I tests. The essay then applies these criteria and tests to a concrete example, comparing the Flying Spaghetti Monster deity with Intelligent Design. For another application, it draws more general fruitful suggestions for the dialogue between science and religion
|Keywords||philosophical method philosophical criteria Flying Spaghetti Monster definition of philosophy dialogue between science and religion Intelligent Design mission of philosophy evaluation standards in philosophy cognitive axiology worldview comparison worldview assessment cognitive values comprehensive worldview task of philosophy coherent worldview scope of philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
Computational and Biological Analogies for Understanding Fine-Tuned Parameters in Physics.Clément Vidal - 2010 - Foundations of Science 15 (4):375 - 393.
Did God Do It? Metaphysical Models and Theological Hermeneutics.Benedikt Paul Göcke - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78 (2):215-231.
Similar books and articles
Objective, Subjective and Intersubjective Selectors of Knowledge.Francis Heylighen - 1997 - Philosophical Explorations.
Connectionism, ACT-R, and the Principle of Self-Organization.Pavel N. Prudkov - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):616-617.
Prediction, Explanation, and Testability as Criteria for Judging Statistical Theories.Brown Grier - 1975 - Philosophy of Science 42 (4):373-383.
Criteria of Identity: Strong and Wrong.Hannes Leitgeb - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (1):61-68.
McAllister's Aesthetics in Science: A Critical Notice.David Davies - 1998 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (1):25 – 32.
A Defense of Environmental Ethics: A Reply to Janna Thompson.Michael P. Nelson - 1993 - Environmental Ethics 15 (3):245-257.
Kryteria identyczności a procedury indywidualizacyjne.Adam Andrzejewski - 2009 - Filozofia Nauki 4.
Added to index2012-04-12
Total downloads40 ( #128,442 of 2,163,870 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #129,223 of 2,163,870 )
How can I increase my downloads?