Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (2):96-97 (2012)

Abstract
Fincher & Thornhill's (F&T's) model is not entirely supported by common patterns of affect behaviors among people who live under varying climatic conditions and among people who endorse varying levels of (Western) religiosity and conservative political ideals. The authors' model is also unable to account for intra-regional heterogeneity in assortative sociality, which, we argue, can be better explained by a framework that emphasizes the differential expression of fundamental social cues for maintaining distinct social network structures
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x11001087
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,587
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-27

Total views
22 ( #500,059 of 2,461,958 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #448,599 of 2,461,958 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes