Philosophy of chemistry and the image of science

Foundations of Science 12 (3):223-234 (2007)

The philosophical analysis of chemistry has advanced at such a pace during the last dozen years that the existence of philosophy of chemistry as an autonomous discipline cannot be doubted any more. The present paper will attempt to analyse the experience of philosophy of chemistry at the, so to say, meta-level. Philosophers of chemistry have especially stressed that all sciences need not be similar to physics. They have tried to argue for chemistry as its own type of science and for a pluralistic understanding of science in general. However, when stressing the specific character of chemistry, philosophers do not always analyse the question ‘What is science?’ theoretically. It is obvious that a ‘monistic’ understanding of science should not be based simply on physics as the epitome of science, regarding it as a historical accident that physics has obtained this status. The author’s point is that the philosophical and methodological image of science should not be chosen arbitrarily; instead, it should be theoretically elaborated as an idealization (theoretical model) substantiated on the historical practice of science. It is argued that although physics has, in a sense, justifiably obtained the status of a paradigm of science, chemistry, which is not simply a physical science, but a discipline with a dual character, is also relevant for elaborating a theoretical model of science. The theoretical model of science is a good tool for examining various issues in philosophy of chemistry as well as in philosophy of science or science studies generally.
Keywords Philosophy of chemistry  Theoretical model of science  Demarcation problems  φ-Science  The dual character of chemistry
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10699-006-9105-0
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,148
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach.Jeffrey S. Poland - 1988 - Philosophical Review 100 (4):653-656.
The Scientific Image.C. Van Fraassen Bas - 1980 - Oxford University Press.
Critical Scientific Realism.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1999 - Oxford University Press.

View all 26 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Autonomy of Chemistry: Old and New Problems. [REVIEW]Rein Vihalemm - 2011 - Foundations of Chemistry 13 (2):97-107.
Biosemiotics: To Know, What Life Knows.Kalevi Kull - 2009 - Cybernetics and Human Knowing 16 (3/4):81-88.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Towards a Philosophy of Chemistry.Joachim Schummer - 1997 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 28 (2):307 - 336.
What has Philosophy to Offer to Chemistry?Nikos Psarros - 1998 - Foundations of Science 3 (1):183-202.
The Autonomy of Chemistry: Old and New Problems. [REVIEW]Rein Vihalemm - 2011 - Foundations of Chemistry 13 (2):97-107.
Theoretical and Practical Reasoning in Chemistry.Jeffrey Kovac - 2002 - Foundations of Chemistry 4 (2):163-171.
The Emergence of the Philosophy of Chemistry.Lee McIntyre - 1999 - Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1):57-63.
On the Neglect of the Philosophy of Chemistry.J. van Brakel - 1999 - Foundations of Chemistry 1 (2):111-174.


Added to PP index

Total views
49 ( #180,377 of 2,285,426 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #253,763 of 2,285,426 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature