Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):35-35 (2005)

Abstract
It is difficult to see how one can support the continuum between rules and similarity, as Pothos proposes. A similarity theory could dispense with the rules end of the continuum. The only thing that we need is one (or more than one) theory of similarity that goes beyond the stimulus-carrying information and behavioristic restrictions that have usually been attributed to similarity theories.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0140525x05450013
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,823
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Rules Versus Similarity Distinction.Emmanuel M. Pothos - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):1-14.
The Discontinuity Between Rules and Similarity.Peter F. Dominey - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):22-23.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
31 ( #339,590 of 2,425,851 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #544,761 of 2,425,851 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes