Abstract
edited by Tuija Takala and Matti Häyry, welcomes contributions on the conceptual and theoretical dimensions of bioethics.The section is dedicated to the idea that words defined by bioethicists and others should not be allowed to imprison people's actual concerns, emotions, and thoughts. Papers that expose the many meanings of a concept, describe the different readings of a moral doctrine, or provide an alternative angle to seemingly self-evident issues are therefore particularly appreciated.The themes covered in the section so far include dignity, naturalness, public interest, community, disability, autonomy, parity of reasoning, symbolic appeals, and toleration.All submitted papers are peer reviewed. To submit a paper or to discuss a suitable topic, contact Tuija Takala at [email protected]
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0963180105050450
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,363
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Toward Critical Bioethics.Vilhjálmur Árnason - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (2):154-164.
Nonconfrontational Rationality or Critical Reasoning.Vilhjálmur Árnason - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (2):228-237.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Method in Bioethics: A Troubled Assessment.Ronald M. Green - 1990 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (2):179-197.
The Future of Bioethics.Howard Brody - 2009 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
28 ( #388,189 of 2,445,387 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,131 of 2,445,387 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes