Leave Everything as it is - A Critique of Marxist Interpretations of Wittgenstein

Critique 41 (1):9-22 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


It is often supposed that Marxist philosophy and Wittgensteinian philosophy are not just very different but that they are opposed to each other. Wittgenstein was notoriously against theorizing in philosophy whereas Marx tried to give a scientific account of human society and culture. Marx famously said that ‘[t]he philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways; the point is to change it’, while Wittgenstein was concerned with conceptual considerations and had very little to say about workers' struggles. My aim in this paper is to show that these apparent differences dissolve once one realizes that Marx and Wittgenstein thought differently about the nature of philosophy. In the course of coming to this conclusion I will look at misinterpretations of Wittgenstein's philosophy from Perry Anderson and Alex Callinicos as well as at Wittgensteinian criticisms of Marxist philosophers such as Leon Trotsky, John Rees and Slavoj Žižek. I will conclude that Marxist philosophers stand to gain from a clearer understanding of Wittgenstein's philosophy and that Wittgensteinians can similarly gain from an appreciation of the kind of analysis of economics, society and politics offered by Marxists.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Leaving Metaphysics to Itself.Lilian Alweiss - 2007 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3):349 – 365.
Wittgenstein, Kant and the Critique of Totality.Paul Livingston - 2007 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (6):691-715.
A Marxist Approach to Business Ethics.J. Angelo Corlett - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (1):99 - 103.
Interpretations of Wittgenstein.Anfinn Stigen - 1962 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 5 (1-4):167-175.
A Marxist Influence on Wittgenstein Via Sraffa.John B. Davis - 2002 - In G. N. Kitching & Nigel Pleasants (eds.), Marx and Wittgenstein: Knowledge, Morality and Politics. Routledge. pp. 35--131.
Foucault, Marxism and Critique.Barry Smart - 1983 - Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Over Interpreting Wittgenstein.Anat Biletzki - 2003 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Whose Ethics? Which Wittgenstein?Duncan Richter - 2002 - Philosophical Papers 31 (3):323-342.


Added to PP

633 (#13,953)

6 months
14 (#63,090)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Robert Vinten
Universidade Nova de Lisboa

Citations of this work

Was Wittgenstein a Liberal Philosopher?Robert Vinten - 2017 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 36 (1):57-82.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references