Neuroethics 4 (1):35-49 (2011)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
Could neuroimaging evidence help us to assess the degree of a person’s responsibility for a crime which we know that they committed? This essay defends an affirmative answer to this question. A range of standard objections to this high-tech approach to assessing people’s responsibility is considered and then set aside, but I also bring to light and then reject a novel objection—an objection which is only encountered when functional (rather than structural) neuroimaging is used to assess people’s responsibility.
|
| Keywords | Moral responsibility Legal responsibility Capacity-theoretic conception of responsibility Capacitarian theory of responsibility Mental capacity Capacity responsibility Neuroimaging fMRI Modal fallacy Automatic functions Theory to the best explanation |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| Reprint years | 2011 |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12152-008-9030-8 |
| Options |
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
PhilArchive copy
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy Papers currently archived: 64,229
External links
- From the Publisher via CrossRef (no proxy)
- dx.doi.org (no proxy)
- europepmc.org
(no proxy) - hdl.handle.net (no proxy)
- link.springer.com (no proxy)
- link.springer.com [2] (no proxy)
- link.springer.com [3] (no proxy)
- resolver.tudelft.nl (no proxy)
- link.springer.com [4] (no proxy)
- repository.tudelft.nl (no proxy)
- ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility.John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
How Does Moral Judgment Work?Joshua Greene & Jonathan Haidt - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (12):517-523.
Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility.Susan Wolf - 1987 - In Ferdinand David Schoeman (ed.), Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 46-62.
The Incompatibility of Free Will and Determinism.Peter Van Inwagen - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 27 (3):185 - 199.
View all 30 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Criminal Responsibility and Neuroscience: No Revolution Yet.Ariane Bigenwald & Valerian Chambon - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility.Nicole A. Vincent - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
The Legal Self: Executive Processes and Legal Theory.William Hirstein & Katrina Sifferd - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (1):151-176.
Fooled by the Brain: Re-Examining the Influence of Neuroimages.N. J. Schweitzer, D. A. Baker & Evan F. Risko - 2013 - Cognition 129 (3):501-511.
Legal Responsibility Adjudication and the Normative Authority of the Mind Sciences.Nicole A. Vincent - 2011 - Philosophical Explorations 14 (3):315-331.
View all 10 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Doing & Deserving; Essays in the Theory of Responsibility.Joel Feinberg - 1970 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Interdependence of Theoretical Concepts and Neuroimaging Data.Christian Huber - 2009 - Poiesis and Praxis 6 (3-4):203-217.
Neuroscience and the Teaching of Mathematics.Kerry Lee & Swee Fong Ng - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):81-86.
Control, Responsibility, and Moral Assessment.Angela M. Smith - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (3):367 - 392.
Epistemological Considerations on Neuroimaging – a Crucial Prerequisite for Neuroethics.Christian G. Huber & Johannes Huber - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (6):340-348.
On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility.Nicole A. Vincent - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
Responsibility for Past Injustice: How to Shift the Burden.Chandran Kukathas - 2003 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (2):165-190.
Is There a Freedom Requirement for Moral Responsibility?Phillip D. Gosselin - 1979 - Dialogue 18 (3):289-306.
More Education, Less Administration: Reflections of Neuroimagers' Attitudes to Ethics Through the Qualitative Looking Glass. [REVIEW]A. A. Kehagia, K. Tairyan, C. Federico, G. H. Glover & J. Illes - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):775-788.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
98 ( #111,413 of 2,455,419 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,205 of 2,455,419 )
2009-01-28
Total views
98 ( #111,413 of 2,455,419 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,205 of 2,455,419 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
