Neuroimaging and Responsibility Assessments
Neuroethics 4 (1):35-49 (2011)
Authors |
Nicole A. Vincent
Delft University of Technology
|
Abstract |
Could neuroimaging evidence help us to assess the degree of a person’s responsibility for a crime which we know that they committed? This essay defends an affirmative answer to this question. A range of standard objections to this high-tech approach to assessing people’s responsibility is considered and then set aside, but I also bring to light and then reject a novel objection—an objection which is only encountered when functional (rather than structural) neuroimaging is used to assess people’s responsibility.
|
Keywords | Moral responsibility Legal responsibility Capacity-theoretic conception of responsibility Capacitarian theory of responsibility Mental capacity Capacity responsibility Neuroimaging fMRI Modal fallacy Automatic functions Theory to the best explanation |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2011 |
DOI | 10.1007/s12152-008-9030-8 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility.John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
How Does Moral Judgment Work?Joshua Greene & Jonathan Haidt - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (12):517-523.
John Martin Fischer and Mark Ravizza: Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. [REVIEW]Michael McKenna - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy 98 (2):93-100.
Neuroscientific Challenges to Free Will and Responsibility.Adina Roskies - 2006 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (9):419-423.
View all 29 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility.Nicole A. Vincent - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
Criminal Responsibility and Neuroscience: No Revolution Yet.Ariane Bigenwald & Valerian Chambon - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
The Legal Self: Executive Processes and Legal Theory.William Hirstein & Katrina Sifferd - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (1):151-176.
Fooled by the Brain: Re-Examining the Influence of Neuroimages.N. J. Schweitzer, D. A. Baker & Evan F. Risko - 2013 - Cognition 129 (3):501-511.
Neuroimages in Court: Less Biasing Than Feared.Adina L. Roskies, N. J. Schweitzer & Michael J. Saks - 2013 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (3):99-101.
View all 9 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Doing & Deserving; Essays in the Theory of Responsibility.Joel Feinberg - 1970 - Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Interdependence of Theoretical Concepts and Neuroimaging Data.Christian G. Huber - 2009 - Poiesis and Praxis 6 (3-4):203-217.
Neuroscience and the Teaching of Mathematics.Kerry Lee & Swee Fong Ng - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (1):81-86.
Control, Responsibility, and Moral Assessment.Angela M. Smith - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (3):367 - 392.
Epistemological Considerations on Neuroimaging – a Crucial Prerequisite for Neuroethics.Christian G. Huber & Johannes Huber - 2009 - Bioethics 23 (6):340-348.
On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility.Nicole A. Vincent - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
Responsibility for Past Injustice: How to Shift the Burden.Chandran Kukathas - 2003 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (2):165-190.
Is There a Freedom Requirement for Moral Responsibility?Phillip D. Gosselin - 1979 - Dialogue 18 (3):289-306.
More Education, Less Administration: Reflections of Neuroimagers' Attitudes to Ethics Through the Qualitative Looking Glass. [REVIEW]A. A. Kehagia, K. Tairyan, C. Federico, G. H. Glover & J. Illes - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):775-788.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
84 ( #99,346 of 2,273,203 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #202,512 of 2,273,203 )
2009-01-28
Total views
84 ( #99,346 of 2,273,203 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #202,512 of 2,273,203 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads