On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility

Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98 (2010)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords responsibility  neuroscience  criminal law  neurolaw
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11572-009-9087-4
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame.Thomas Scanlon - 2008 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
How Does Moral Judgment Work?Joshua Greene & Jonathan Haidt - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (12):517-523.
Moral Enhancement.Thomas Douglas - 2008 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (3):228-245.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Punishment.Zachary Hoskins - 2016 - Analysis:anw022.
A Retributive Argument Against Punishment.Greg Roebuck & David Wood - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (1):73-86.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-12-21

Total downloads

498 ( #3,485 of 2,169,133 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

21 ( #16,027 of 2,169,133 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums