Study of a Cognitive Dissonance Intervention to Address High School Students' Cheating Attitudes and Behaviors
Ethics and Behavior 19 (3):218-226 (2009)
Forty-four high school students took part in focus-type group that used an induced hypocrisy paradigm developed from cognitive dissonance theory (Festinger, 1957) to reduce cheating behavior. Posttesting following the intervention showed that, contrary to expectations, these students' attitudes toward cheating and self-reported cheating behaviors did not decrease relative to those of 65 control participants who did not participate in the group intervention. All participants reported a greater intention to cheat in the future at posttest as well as an increase in cheating behavior. Although participants did not view cheating favorably, a large majority admitted cheating and indicated that they had never been caught
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
An Examination of Academic Misconduct Intentions and the Ineffectiveness of Syllabus Statements.Sara Staats & Julie M. Hupp - 2012 - Ethics and Behavior 22 (4):239 - 247.
Dishonesty in the Classroom: The Effect of Cognitive Dissonance and the Mitigating Influence of Religious Commitment. [REVIEW]Gordon F. Woodbine & Vimala Amirthalingam - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (2):139-155.
The “Epidemic” of Cheating Depends on Its Definition: A Critique of Inferring the Moral Quality of “Cheating in Any Form”.Bradford Barnhardt - forthcoming - Ethics and Behavior:1-14.
Similar books and articles
Attitudes Toward, and Intentions to Report, Academic Cheating Among Students in Singapore.Vivien K. G. Lim & Sean K. B. See - 2001 - Ethics and Behavior 11 (3):261 – 274.
Cheating in Advantaged High Schools: Prevalence, Justifications, and Possibilities for Change.Mollie K. Galloway - 2012 - Ethics and Behavior 22 (5):378 - 399.
The Theory of Planned Behavior as a Model of Academic Dishonesty in Engineering and Humanities Undergraduates.Trevor S. Harding, Matthew J. Mayhew, Cynthia J. Finelli & Donald D. Carpenter - 2007 - Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):255 – 279.
True Confessions?: Alumni's Retrospective Reports on Undergraduate Cheating Behaviors.Jennifer Yardley & Melanie Domenech Rodr - 2009 - Ethics and Behavior 19 (1):1 – 14.
Using the Scenario Method to Analyze Cheating Behaviors.Peter W. Schuhmann, Robert T. Burrus, Preston D. Barber, J. Edward Graham & M. Fara Elikai - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (1):17-33.
A Cross-Country Evaluation of Cheating in Academia—A Comparison of Data From the US and the Czech Republic.Marek Preiss, Helen A. Klein, Nancy M. Levenburg & Alena Nohavova - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (2):157-167.
Examining the Decision Process of Students' Cheating Behavior: An Empirical Study. [REVIEW]Richard A. Bernardi, Rene L. Metzger, Ryann G. Scofield Bruno, Marisa A. Wade Hoogkamp, Lillian E. Reyes & Gary H. Barnaby - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 50 (4):397-414.
The Effects of Instructor Fear Appeals and Moral Appeals on Cheating-Related Attitudes and Behavior of University Students.Jennifer Akeley Spear & Ann Neville Miller - 2012 - Ethics and Behavior 22 (3):196 - 207.
Articles: The Relations Among Religion, Motivation, and College Cheating: A Natural Experiment.David A. Rettinger & Augustus E. Jordan - 2005 - Ethics and Behavior 15 (2):107 – 129.
Does Moral Judgment Go Offline When Students Are Online? A Comparative Analysis of Undergraduates' Beliefs and Behaviors Related to Conventional and Digital Cheating.Jason M. Stephens, Michael F. Young & Thomas Calabrese - 2007 - Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):233 – 254.
Does the Type of Cheating Influence Undergraduate Students' Perceptions of Cheating?Kathleen K. Molnar & Marilyn G. Kletke - 2012 - Journal of Academic Ethics 10 (3):201-212.
An Examination of Cheating and its Antecedents Among Marketing and Management Majors.Kenneth J. Smith, Jeanette A. Davy & Debbie Easterling - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 50 (1):63-80.
An Examination of the Role of Attitudinal Characteristics and Motivation on the Cheating Behavior of Business Students.Jeanette A. Davy, Joel F. Kincaid, Kenneth J. Smith & Michelle A. Trawick - 2007 - Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):281 – 302.
Added to index2010-07-27
Total downloads31 ( #162,023 of 2,153,537 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #184,516 of 2,153,537 )
How can I increase my downloads?