Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):297-319 (2010)

Authors
Steve Viner
Middlebury College
Abstract
Some contemporary Just War theorists, like Jeff McMahan, have recently built upon an individual right of self-defense to articulate moral rules of war that are at odds with commonly accepted views. For instance, they argue that in principle combatants who fight on the unjust side ought to be liable to punishment on that basis alone. Also, they reject the conclusion that combatants fighting on both sides are morally equal. In this paper, I argue that these theorists overextend their self-defense analysis when it comes to the punishment of unjust combatants, and I show how in an important sense just and unjust combatants are morally equal. I contend that the individualistic and quid pro quo perspective of the self-defense analysis fails to consider properly how the international community, morally speaking, ought to treat combatants, and I set forth four elements of justice applicable to war, which, together, support the conclusion that in principle the international community should not take on the activity of punishing combatants solely for fighting on the unjust side.
Keywords McMahan  Just War  Combatants  The moral equality of soldiers  Self-defense  Punishment  Moral luck
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11572-010-9102-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,742
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Mortal Questions.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - Cambridge University Press.
Two Treatises of Government.John Locke - 1988 - Cambridge University Press.
Killing in War.Jeff McMahan - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Leviathan.Thomas Hobbes - 1651 - Harmondsworth, Penguin.

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The International Rule of Law and Killing in War.Jovana Davidovic - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (3):531-553.
The Ethics of Killing in War.Jeff McMahan - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (1):693-733.
The Responsibility of Soldiers and the Ethics of Killing in War.Yitzhak Benbaji - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):558–572.
The War Convention and the Moral Division of Labour.Yitzhak Benbaji - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):593-617.
The Ethics of Killing in War.Jeff McMahan - 2004 - Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
Rights, Liability, and the Moral Equality of Combatants.Uwe Steinhoff - 2012 - The Journal of Ethics 16 (4):339-366.
Public War and the Moral Equality of Combatants.Graham Parsons - 2012 - Journal of Military Ethics 11 (4):2012.
Self-Defence and the Principle of Non-Combatant Immunity.Helen Frowe - 2011 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 8 (4):530-546.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-13

Total views
56 ( #170,457 of 2,349,895 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #511,368 of 2,349,895 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes