Neuroethics 4 (2):175-178 (2011)
This is a report on the 3-day workshop “The Neuroscience of Responsibility” that was held in the Philosophy Department at Delft University of Technology in The Netherlands during February 11th–13th, 2010. The workshop had 25 participants from The Netherlands, Germany, Italy, UK, USA, Canada and Australia, with expertise in philosophy, neuroscience, psychology, psychiatry and law. Its aim was to identify current trends in neurolaw research related specifically to the topic of responsibility, and to foster international collaborative research on this topic. The workshop agenda was constructed by the participants at the start of each day by surveying the topics of greatest interest and relevance to participants. In what follows, we summarize (1) the questions which participants identified as most important for future research in this field, (2) the most prominent themes that emerged from the discussions, and (3) the two main international collaborative research project plans that came out of this meeting
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
How Does Moral Judgment Work?Joshua Greene & Jonathan Haidt - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (12):517-523.
Functional Neuroimaging and the Law: Trends and Directions for Future Scholarship.Stacey A. Tovino - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (9):44 – 56.
Citations of this work BETA
The Ethical Implications of Considering Neurolaw as a New Power.Daniel Pallarés-Dominguez & Elsa González Esteban - forthcoming - Ethics and Behavior:1-15.
Similar books and articles
'Putting Yourself in Other People's Shoes': The Use of Forum Theatre to Explore Refugee and Homeless Issues in Schools.Laura Day - 2002 - Journal of Moral Education 31 (1):21-34.
Disclosure of Research Result to Research Participants: Needs and Attitudes of Adolescents and Parents.Conrad Vincent Fernandez, Shaureen Taweel, Eric D. Kodish & Charles Weijer - unknown
Bioethics Training in Uganda: Report on Research and Clinical Ethics Workshops. [REVIEW]Cynthia Griggins, Christian Simon, Frederick Nakwagala & Rebecca Pentz - 2011 - HEC Forum 23 (1):43-56.
How to Be a Successful Scientist.Paul Thagard - 2005 - In M. Gorman, R. Tweney, D. Gooding & A. Kincannon (eds.), Scientific and Technological Thinking. Erlbaum. pp. 159--171.
An Effective Strategy for Integrating Ethics Across the Curriculum in Engineering: An ABET 2000 Challenge.José A. Cruz & William J. Frey - 2003 - Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4):543-568.
Control Groups in Psychosocial Intervention Research: Ethical and Methodological Issues.Linda L. Street & Jason B. Luoma - 2002 - Ethics and Behavior 12 (1):1 – 30.
About the Oxford Symmetry Workshop and the Papers Posted Under That Heading.Katherine A. Brading & Elena Castellani - unknown
On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility.Nicole A. Vincent - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
Added to index2010-06-19
Total downloads54 ( #98,201 of 2,177,930 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,487 of 2,177,930 )
How can I increase my downloads?