“Once Upon a Time” Philosophy of Science: STS, Science Policy and the Semantic View of Scientific Theories [Book Review]

Axiomathes 19 (4):465-480 (2009)

Is a policy-friendly philosophy of science possible? In order to respond this question, I consider a particular instance of contemporary philosophy of science, the semantic view of scientific theories, by placing it in the broader methodological landscape of the integration of philosophy of science into STS (Science and Technology Studies) as a component of the overall contribution of the latter to science policy. In that context, I defend a multi-disciplinary methodological integration of the special discipline composing STS against a reductionist interdisciplinary unification, arguing that if STS wants to contribute to policy advising by constructing narratives of science practice feasible for science policy both in terms of descriptive completeness and intelligibility, then it must avoid the explanatory reductionism tendencies of special disciplines in interdisciplinary contexts. This would favour, at the same time, a relaxation of esoteric language. On this basis, it seems that the semantic view is one right candidate among other approaches in the philosophy of science for facilitating the integration of the methodologically different contributions to STS toward policy objectives. In fact, besides offering a more realistic and descriptively complete picture of science practice with respect to its predecessor in the philosophy of science, namely the syntactic view, the semantic view is also able to capture some aspects of science practice that elude even sociological approaches to STS, thus inviting different perspective on the same subject matter.
Keywords Interdisciplinarity  Multidisciplinarity  Philosophy of science  Semantic view  Science and technology studies  Science policy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10516-009-9083-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,662
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How the Laws of Physics Lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - Oxford University Press.
We Have Never Been Modern.Bruno Latour - 1993 - Harvard University Press.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Teaching Science at the University Level: What About the Ethics?Penny J. Gilmer - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (2):173-180.
What Scientific Theories Could Not Be.Hans Halvorson - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (2):183-206.
STS and Utopian Thinking.Ellsworth R. Fuhrman - 1999 - Social Epistemology 13 (1):85 – 93.
The Importance of Models in Theorizing: A Deflationary Semantic View.Stephen M. Downes - 1992 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992:142 - 153.
Science Policy From a Naturalistic Sociological Epistemology.Donald T. Campbell - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:14 - 29.
Models and Theories I: The Semantic View Revisited.Chuang Liu - 1997 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 11 (2):147 – 164.


Added to PP index

Total views
36 ( #248,096 of 2,280,723 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #837,375 of 2,280,723 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature