Symposion: Theoretical and Applied Inquiries in Philosophy and Social Sciences 3 (4): 421-433 (2016)
Abstract |
In Beyond Art (2014), Dominic Lopes proposed a new theory of art, the buck passing theory. Rather than attempting to define art in terms of exhibited or genetic featured shared by all artworks, Lopes passes the buck to theories of individual arts. He proposes that we seek theories of music, painting, poetry, and other arts. Once we have these theories, we know everything there is to know about the theory of art. This essay presents two challenges to the theory. First, this essay argues that Lopes is wrong in supposing that theories of arts were developed to deal with the ‘hard cases’ – developments such as Duchamp’s readymades and conceptual art. This is a problem since Lopes holds that the buck passing theory’s capacity to deal with the hard cases is one of its virtues. Second, this essay argues that the buck passing theory has no account of which activities are arts and no account of what makes some activity an art.
|
Keywords | aesthetics definitions of art buck passing theory of art Dominic Lopes philosophy of art theories of art |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2016 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art.Arthur Coleman Danto - 1986 - Columbia University Press.
The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems.Stephen Halliwell - 2002 - Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.
The Aesthetics of Mimesis. Ancients Texts and Modern Problems. [REVIEW]Dimitri El Murr & S. Halliwell - 2002 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 124 (215):219-220.
View all 14 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Remember the Medium! Film, Medium Specificity, and Response-Dependence.Clotilde Torregrossa - 2020 - Dissertation, University of St. Andrews
Similar books and articles
Reasons and Value – in Defence of the Buck-Passing Account.Jussi Suikkanen - 2005 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (5):513 - 535.
A Very Good Reason to Reject the Buck-Passing Account.Alex Gregory - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (2):287-303.
Resisting Buck-Passing Accounts of Prudential Value.Guy Fletcher - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 157 (1):77-91.
The Buck-Passing Account of Value: Lessons From Crisp.S. Matthew Liao - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 151 (3):421 - 432.
Buck-Passing About Goodness.John Skorupski - 2007 - In J. Josefsson D. Egonsson (ed.), Hommage à Wlodek. Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Wlodek Rabinowicz.
What’s Wrong with Moorean Buck-Passing?Francesco Orsi - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 164 (3):727-746.
Excellence and Means: On the Limits of Buck-Passing. [REVIEW]Johan Brännmark - 2008 - Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (3):301-315.
Consequentialism and the Wrong Kind of Reasons: A Reply to Lang.John Brunero - 2010 - Utilitas 22 (3):351-359.
Abandoning the Buck Passing Analysis of Final Value.Andrew E. Reisner - 2009 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):379 - 395.
Naturalism and the Buck-Passing Account of Value.Francesco Orsi - 2006 - Philosophical Writings 32 (2):58-77.
G. E. Moore on Goodness and Reasons.Jonas Olson - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):525 – 534.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2016-11-06
Total views
590 ( #13,728 of 2,498,247 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
90 ( #8,056 of 2,498,247 )
2016-11-06
Total views
590 ( #13,728 of 2,498,247 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
90 ( #8,056 of 2,498,247 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads