Another look at the second incompleteness theorem

Review of Symbolic Logic 13 (2):269-295 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper we study proofs of some general forms of the Second Incompleteness Theorem. These forms conform to the Feferman format, where the proof predicate is fixed and the representation of the set of axioms varies. We extend the Feferman framework in one important point: we allow the interpretation of number theory to vary.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Note on Boolos' Proof of the Incompleteness Theorem.Makoto Kikuchi - 1994 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 40 (4):528-532.
Query the Triple Loophole of the Proof of Gödel Incompleteness Theorem.FangWen Yuan - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 41:77-94.
The Scope of Gödel’s First Incompleteness Theorem.Bernd Buldt - 2014 - Logica Universalis 8 (3-4):499-552.
Heterologicality and Incompleteness.Cezary Cieśliński - 2002 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 48 (1):105-110.
Other Proofs of Old Results.Henryk Kotlarski - 1998 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 44 (4):474-480.
A note on the first incompleteness theorem.Katsumasa Ishii - 2003 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 49 (2):214-216.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-06-11

Downloads
54 (#288,506)

6 months
13 (#185,110)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

There May Be Many Arithmetical Gödel Sentences.Kaave Lajevardi & Saeed Salehi - 2021 - Philosophia Mathematica 29 (2):278–287.
Current Research on Gödel’s Incompleteness Theorems.Yong Cheng - 2021 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 27 (2):113-167.
Provability logic.Rineke Verbrugge - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The absorption law: Or: how to Kreisel a Hilbert–Bernays–Löb.Albert Visser - 2020 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 60 (3-4):441-468.

Add more citations