Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):643-644 (2002)
We support Shanker & King's (S&K's) proposal for a dynamic systems approach in ape language research, but question their vision of what it means to have language. Language plays an essential role in the making of the human mind. It underlies any kind of human interaction and codetermines perception and action. Moreover, what gives human thought the very characteristic architecture of textuality criterially requires a third party.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Language, Social Ecology and Experience.Grant Gillett - 1991 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (3):195 – 203.
What Ape Language Research Means for Representations.Edward Kako - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):629-629.
Distinctively Human Thinking.Peter Carruthers - 1998 - In Peter Carruthers & Jill Boucher (eds.), Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 69.
Beyond Subjectivism: Heidegger on Language and the Human Being.Abraham Mansbach - 2002 - Greenwood Press.
Aspects of Human Language: Where Motherese?Emmanuel Gilissen - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):514-514.
Dancing with Humans: Interaction as Unintended Consequence.John L. Locke - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):632-633.
Blind Men, Elephants, and Dancing Information Processors.Chris Westbury - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (5):645-646.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #271,957 of 2,172,658 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #117,216 of 2,172,658 )
How can I increase my downloads?