Teaching Philosophy 44 (1):29-57 (2021)

Sarah Vitale
Ball State University
David Concepcion
Ball State University
In her book Specifications Grading, Linda B. Nilson advocates for a grading regimen she claims will save faculty time, increase student motivation, and improve the quality and rigor of student work. If she is right, there is a strong case for many faculty to adopt some version of the system she recommends. In this paper, we argue that she is mostly right and recommend that faculty move away from traditional grading. We begin by rehearsing the central features of specifications grading and providing two examples of how to implement it in philosophy classes. In light of the examples, we argue that specifications grading fulfills two of Nilson’s central desiderata but not the third. Since specifications grading generates two benefits that when combined increase student learning, without adding or increasing burdens, we conclude that student learning increases when courses are revised to include aspects of specifications grading.
Keywords Teaching Philosophy  Student Learning  Grading, Specifications
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/teachphil2020121133
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Collaborative Learning in Engineering Ethics.Joseph R. Herkert - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (4):447-462.
The Case for Motivational Grading.John Immerwahr - 2011 - Teaching Philosophy 34 (4):335-346.
Fair Grades.Daryl Close - 2009 - Teaching Philosophy 32 (4):361-398.
Grading According to a Rubric.Maralee Harrell - 2005 - Teaching Philosophy 28 (1):3-15.
Assessing Grading.Christopher Knapp - 2007 - Public Affairs Quarterly 21 (3):275-294.
How to Assure Student Preparation and Structure Student-Student Interaction.David W. Concepción - 2005 - Discourse: Learning and Teaching in Philosophical and Religious Studies 5 (1):107-119.
Improving the Student Experience.Elizabeth Staddon & Paul Standish - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (4):631-648.
Improving the Student Experience.Paul Standish Elizabeth Staddon - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (4):631-648.


Added to PP index

Total views
102 ( #108,756 of 2,461,943 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
67 ( #11,738 of 2,461,943 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes