?Some more? notes, toward a ?third? sophistic

Argumentation 5 (2):117-139 (1991)
Abstract
Historians of rhetoric refer to two Sophistics, one in the 5th century B.C. and another c. 2nd century A.D. Besides these two, there is a 3rd Sophistic, but it is not necessarily sequential. (The 3rd is “counter” to counting sequentially.) Whereas the representative Sophists of the 1st Sophistic is Protagoras, and the second, Aeschines, the representative sophists of the 3rd are Gorgias (as proto-Third) and Friedrich Nietzsche, Jean-François Lyotard, Michel Foucault, Jacques Lacan, and Paul de Man.To distinguish between and among Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, and then Protagoras, Gorgias, and Lacan, the author determines how far each of these personages can “count.” The model of counting, used semiotically across the topoi of “possible/impossible,” is that of the people of New Guinea: “one thing, two things, many things.” It is determined (generally) that the philosophers, including Aristotle, count to “one”; the Sophists to “two”; and Gorgias, Lacan, and Lyotard, et al. count to “many things,” thereby breaking up a monism or binarism. The ancient philosophers employ a substratum of probability to hold together the contraries of “possible/impossible”; the Sophists employ anti/logic, which keeps the contraries/antitheses separate and therefore without synthesis, but which eventually threatens the integrity of the substratum, or the law of non-contradiction; and Gorgias, Lacan, Lyotard et al. theorize about the “impossibility”/“Resistance” of the Logos (reason, logic, law, argumentation, history) to Theory/Totalization, because of the Gorgian Kairos and the Lacanian Real — both of which enter the Logos and break up the cycle of the antitheses and create “something new, irrational” (Untersteiner).This “breaking up” has a negative/positive influence on Protagoras's “man-measure doctrine,” which in turn has a similar influence on “the problem of the ethical subject.” The subject/agent not only no longer “knows” (by way of Logos) but also no longer “acts” (as independent agent); the subject becomes a function of Logos as determined by Kairos/Real; it moves from a hypotaxis/syntaxis of “one” and “two” to a radical parataxis/paralogy of “some more.”From the “Impossibility”/“tragedy” of knowledge, however, comes the “Possible,” or “Possibilisms,” which allows for the new (though divided) ethical subject to reclaim its position as “individual.” Such a reclamation of the subject, however, has a profound effect on argumentation, and especially the notion of “consensus.” What is wanted, then, in a Third Sophistic “ethical” — as opposed to a “political” — rhetoric is “dissensus” through radical parataxes and paralogies
Keywords Consensus  dissensus   Kairos  paralogy  parataxis  the ethical subject  the Lacanian Real  third Sophistic
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 1995
DOI 10.1007/BF00054001
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,062
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Differend.Jean-François Lyotard - 1988 - University of Minnesota Press.
Freud and Philosophy.Paul Ricoeur - 1971 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 32 (1):135-135.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Second Sophistic.Tim Whitmarsh - 2005 - Oxford ;Oxford University Press, Published for the Classical Association.
The Sophistic Movement.Rachel Barney - 2006 - In M. L. Gill & P. Pellegrin (eds.), A Companion to Ancient Philosophy. Blackwell.
Four Educators in Plato's Theaetetus.Avi I. Mintz - 2011 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 45 (4):657-673.
The Second Sophistic.Graham Anderson - 1978 - The Classical Review 28 (01):78-.
Is There a Sophistic Ethics?Richard Bett - 2002 - Ancient Philosophy 22 (2):235-262.
The Sophistic Movement.Gerard Watson - 1982 - Philosophical Studies 29:334-335.
The Sophistic Movement.Robert G. Turnbull - 1983 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (2):282-284.
Presidential Address: The Third Sophistic.James K. Feibleman - 1985 - Philosophical Topics 13 (2):7-18.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-01-04

Total views
4 ( #832,448 of 2,312,940 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #504,740 of 2,312,940 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature