Addenda to the third man argument: A reply to professor Sellars

Philosophical Review 64 (3):438-448 (1955)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.2307/2182210

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Socratic studies.Gregory Vlastos - 1994 - New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Myles Burnyeat.
Vlastos and "the third man".Wilfrid Sellars - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (3):405-437.
The man of power: A reply to professor Rogers.Warner Fite - 1913 - Philosophical Review 22 (1):38-52.
Action, knowledge, and reality.Wilfrid Sellars & Hector-Neri Castañeda (eds.) - 1975 - Indianapolis,: Bobbs-Merrill.
Postscript to the third man: A reply to mr. Geach.Gregory Vlastos - 1956 - Philosophical Review 65 (1):83-94.
Professor Sellars on meaning and aboutness.Sid Thomas - 1962 - Philosophical Studies 13 (5):68-74.
Professor Owen, Aristotle, and the third man argument.James C. Dybikowski - 1972 - Mind 81 (323):445-447.
Sellars' behaviourism: A reply to Fred Wilson.Ausonio Marras - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 30 (December):413-418.
The Middle Does Not Hold.William A. Rottschaefer - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:361-369.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
73 (#217,881)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Abstract objects.Gideon Rosen - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Infinte Regress Arguments.Claude Gratton - 2009 - Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references