Authors
Justin Vlasits
University of Illinois, Chicago
Abstract
Margaret MacDonald (1907–56) was a central figure in the history of early analytic philosophy in Britain due to both her editorial work as well as her own writings. While her later work on aesthetics and political philosophy has recently received attention, her early writings in the 1930s present a coherent and, for its time, strikingly original blend of common-sense and scientific philosophy. In these papers, MacDonald tackles the central problems of philosophy of her day: verification, the problem of induction, and the relationship between philosophical and scientific method. MacDonald’s philosophy of science starts from the principle that we should carefully analyse the elements of scientific practice (particularly its temporal features) and the ways that scientists describe that practice. That is, she applies the techniques of ordinary language philosophy to actual scientific language. MacDonald shows how ‘scientific common-sense’ is inconsistent with both of the dominant schools of philosophy of her day. Bringing MacDonald back into the story of analytic philosophy corrects the impression that in early analytic philosophy, there are fundamental dichotomies between the style of Moore and Wittgenstein, on the one hand, and the Vienna Circle on the other.
Keywords Induction  Verificationism  Early Analytic Philosophy  Feminist History of Philosophy  Ordinary Language Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09608788.2021.1924615
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Plea for Excuses.John Austin - 1957 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57:1--30.
Meaning and Verification.Moritz Schlick - 1936 - Philosophical Review 45 (4):339-369.
I.—A Plea for Excuses: The Presidential Address.J. L. Austin - 1957 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57 (1):1-30.

View all 59 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Scientific Realism and Basic Common Sense.Howard Sankey - 2014 - Kairos. Revista de Filosofia and Ciência 10:11-24.
Common Sense.Michael De Medeiros - 2009 - Weigl Publishers.
Scientific Realism and the Conflict with Common Sense.Howard Sankey - 2020 - In Wenceslao J. Gonzalez (ed.), New Approaches to Scientific Realism. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 68-83.
A Dilemma for the Scientific Realist.Howard Sankey - 2018 - Spontaneous Generations 9 (1):65-67.
Common-Sense and Scientific Psychology.Matthew Nudds - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):171-180.
A Scientific-Realist Account of Common Sense.Orly Shenker - 2020 - In Rik Peels & René Van Woudenberg (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Common-Sense Philosophy. Cambridge: pp. 333-351.
Sociology and Common Sense.David Thomas - 1978 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 21 (1-4):1 – 32.
Why Philosophy Can Overturn Common Sense.Susanna Rinard - 2013 - In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology Volume 4. Oxford University Press. pp. 185.
Why Philosophy Can Overturn Common Sense 1.Susanna Rinard - 2013 - Oxford Studies in Epistemology 4.
The Virtues of Common Sense.Brian Grant - 2001 - Philosophy 76 (2):191-209.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-05-21

Total views
38 ( #277,115 of 2,439,025 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #19,429 of 2,439,025 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes