Reception of the biographical method in historical and anthropogical studies

Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 13:156-165 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Purpose. To update the question of using the biographical method and establishing its interrelation with other scientific methods and methodological principles in historical and anthropological research. Theoretical basis. Consideration of the biographical method in historical and anthropological studios carried out in the course of the general theoretical "renaissance" of classical humanitarianism, which is largely due to the uncertainty and ambiguity of theoretical discourses and discursive practices of postmodernism, pose to the researcher a number of new tasks. Among them there is "discovery of the implicit" i.e. not just the description of the results of human cultural activity in the immediate given, but the disclosure of sometimes unconscious mechanisms of this activity, of the deep "springs" of culture that ensure its movement. Originality. The authors of this research do not touch on the sociological issues of biographical research, which are widely represented in the writings of contemporary Western researchers. The subject of our message is a biographical method that is genetically derived from Ch. A. Sainte-Beuve, who believed that the main task of the biographer is to carry out an analysis of the personality of a prominent person. The research in the realm of humanities in general and in civil history in particular should take into account not only the changes in the sociocultural aspects of being, but also the corresponding transformation of methodological approaches to the analysis of the epiphenomena of "fluid modernity". This obvious fact led us to an understanding of the need for a historiosophical study of the problem of reception of a biographical method in historical and anthropological works with the subsequent historical, philosophical, cultural representation of the biographical method. Conclusions. The historiosophical transformations of the last decades, with their radical change in concepts, methods and techniques, return the researcher to the improvement of the biographical methodology that today represents anthropocentrism, which fills the science with humanistic content. The use of this methodology requires from a scientist to adhere to the basic methodological principles and mastering other scientific methods, primarily dialectics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reception of the biographical method in historical and anthropogical studies.T. I. Vlasova & G. G. Krivtchik - 2018 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 13:156-165.
Why American Sociology Needs Biographical Sociology—European Style.Ines W. Jindra - 2014 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 44 (4):389-412.
Cognitive aspects of modern philosophy of historical knowledge.Spartak Sh Aytov - 2014 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 5:103-108.
Philosophy of culture M.m. Bakhtin: Historical and anthropological dimension.Spartak Sh Aytov - 2013 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 3:52-61.
Th e pRivate Theater : a Phenomenological Investigation of Daydreaming.James Morley - 1998 - Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 29 (1):116-134.
Cognitive aspects of modern philosophy of historical knowledge.Spartak Sh Aytov - 2014 - Anthropological Measurements of Philosophical Research 5:103-108.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-12-06

Downloads
8 (#1,291,989)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tania Vlasova
Julius-Maximilians-Universität, Würzburg

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references