“The Revolution of Relativity” and Self-Consciousness in the History of Philosophy of the 20th Century

Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 11:114-125 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses the development of self-consciousness in the history of philosophy of the 20th century compared with the same development in the natural sciences. The author characterizes this stage of philosophical historiography as the “revolution of relativity.” This movement of self-consciousness was apparent in not only the humanities but also the natural sciences at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. Awareness of probability is a fundamental achievement of non-classic physics, which has since reversed its paradigm. In contrast to the Newtonian scheme, quantum theory introduces the category of probability and insists that we can talk about certain physical phenomena only in a probabilistic mode and that the method of observation affects the phenomena observed. Consequently, any “object-subject” and “subject-subject” interaction involves the experience of the researcher, which thereby affects the results. The same model of interpretation lies at the basis of the turn toward self-consciousness in the history of philosophy of the 20th century. The classical history of philosophy is built on idealization and gives an objective description of the philosophical process. Following the other sciences, the philosophy of the 20th century understood that historical and philosophical reality largely depends on the historians of philosophy; that such reality is constructed by certain means; that there is a certain kind of historical and philosophical work; and that, with different strategies, methods and approaches, we obtain different results that are complementary to each other. The 20th century was a time of competing interpretations rather than gradually progressing historical and philosophical systems. This stimulated the search for own ideal of objectivity. For philosophical historiography, this is the hermeneutic ideal of the structural analysis of text or architectonic reconstruction. The historicalphilosophical revolution of relativity promotes the development of critical historiography and revises the foundations of its classical tradition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why did the new physics force out the old?Rinat M. Nugayev - 1996 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 10 (2):127 – 140.
[Georges Canguilhem and 20th-century biology].M. Morange - 1999 - Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 53 (1):83-105.
No letters: Hobbes and 20th-century philosophy of language.W. P. Grundy - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (4):486-512.
A Survey Of Chinese Aesthetics In Late 20th Century.Fu-Xing Xue - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 1:93-102.
The Positivism Dispute Revisited.Thomas Uebel - 1994 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 2:323-329.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-10-04

Downloads
11 (#1,110,001)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Truth and Method.H. G. Gadamer - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 36 (4):487-490.
Parmenides.Martin Heidegger - 1982 - Indiana University Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references