Building Bayesian networks for legal evidence with narratives: a case study evaluation

Artificial Intelligence and Law 22 (4):375-421 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a criminal trial, evidence is used to draw conclusions about what happened concerning a supposed crime. Traditionally, the three main approaches to modeling reasoning with evidence are argumentative, narrative and probabilistic approaches. Integrating these three approaches could arguably enhance the communication between an expert and a judge or jury. In previous work, techniques were proposed to represent narratives in a Bayesian network and to use narratives as a basis for systematizing the construction of a Bayesian network for a legal case. In this paper, these techniques are combined to form a design method for constructing a Bayesian network based on narratives. This design method is evaluated by means of an extensive case study concerning the notorious Dutch case of the Anjum murders.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,649

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Argument Diagram Extraction From Evidential Bayesian Networks.Jeroen Keppens - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (2):109-143.
Formalising Ordinary Legal Disputes: A Case Study. [REVIEW]Henry Prakken - 2008 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (4):333-359.
Legal Stories and the Process of Proof.Floris Bex & Bart Verheij - 2013 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (3):253-278.
Out of Their Minds: Legal Theory in Neural Networks. [REVIEW]Dan Hunter - 1999 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3):129-151.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
17 (#634,824)

6 months
1 (#419,510)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile