Psychological Closure Does Not Entail Cognitive Closure

Dialectica 71 (1):101-115 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

According to some philosophers, we are “cognitively closed” to the answers to certain problems. McGinn has taken the next step and offered a list of examples: the mind/body problem, the problem of the self and the problem of free will. There are naturalistic, scientific answers to these problems, he argues, but we cannot reach them because of our cognitive limitations. In this paper, we take issue with McGinn's thesis as the most well-developed and systematic one among the so-called “new mysterians”. McGinn aims to establish a strong, representational notion of cognitive closure: a principled inaccessibility of a true theory of certain properties of the world, but he offers arguments that only bear on difficulties with psychologically grasping the correct answers. The latter we label psychological closure. We argue that representational closure does not follow from psychological closure, and that McGinn's case therefore falters. We could very well be able to represent the correct answer to some question, even without being able to grasp that answer psychologically. McGinn's mistake in deriving representational closure from psychological closure rests on a fallacy of equivocation relating to the concept of ‘understanding’. By making this distinction explicit, we hope to improve our thinking about the limits of science in particular and human knowledge in general.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cognitive Closure And Body-mind Problem In Mcginn’s Philosophy.Monika Szachniewicz - 2011 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 6 (4):37-53.
Against McGinn's Mysterianism.Erhan Demircioğlu - 2016 - Cilicia Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):1-10.
Nozick's defense of closure.Peter Baumann - 2012 - In Kelly Becker & Tim Black (eds.), The Sensitivity Principle in Epistemology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 11--27.
Knowledge and deductive closure.James L. White - 1991 - Synthese 86 (3):409 - 423.
Closure, Contrast, and Answer.Jonathan Schaffer - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 133 (2):233-255.
Epistemic closure.Peter Baumann - 2011 - In Duncan Pritchard & Sven Bernecker (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Epistemology. Routledge. pp. 597--608.
Narrative closure.Noël Carroll - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 135 (1):1 - 15.
Living without closure.Krista Lawlor - 2005 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 69 (1):25-50.
Fuzzy closure systems on L-ordered sets.Lankun Guo, Guo-Qiang Zhang & Qingguo Li - 2011 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 57 (3):281-291.
What does McGinn think we cannot know?James Garvey - 1997 - Analysis 57 (3):196-201.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-06-13

Downloads
362 (#56,488)

6 months
87 (#55,253)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Michael Vlerick
Tilburg University
Maarten Boudry
University of Ghent

References found in this work

The View From Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Rules and representations.Noam Chomsky (ed.) - 1980 - New York: Columbia University Press.
The Modularity of Mind.Robert Cummins & Jerry Fodor - 1983 - Philosophical Review 94 (1):101.

View all 38 references / Add more references