Bioethics 34 (7):712-718 (2020)

Authors
Carissa Véliz
Oxford University
Abstract
This paper argues that assessing personal responsibility in healthcare settings for the allocation of medical resources would be too privacy-invasive to be morally justifiable. In addition to being an inappropriate and moralizing intrusion into the private lives of patients, it would put patients’ sensitive data at risk, making data subjects vulnerable to a variety of privacy-related harms. Even though we allow privacy-invasive investigations to take place in legal trials, the justice and healthcare systems are not analogous. The duty of doctors and healthcare professionals is to help patients as best they can—not to judge them. Patients should not be forced into giving up any more personal information than what is strictly necessary to receive an adequate treatment, and their medical data should only be used for appropriate purposes. Medical ethics codes should reflect these data rights. When a doctor asks personal questions that are irrelevant to diagnose or treat a patient, the appropriate response from the patient is: ‘none of your business’.
Keywords confidentiality  data minimization  data rights  egalitarianism  luck  medical ethics codes  personal responsibility  privacy
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/bioe.12711
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Medical Privacy and Big Data: A Further Reason in Favour of Public Universal Healthcare Coverage.Carissa Véliz - 2019 - In T. C. de Campos, J. Herring & A. M. Phillips (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Medical Law. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. pp. 306-318.
Introduction to Data Ethics.James Brusseau - 2018 - In The Business Ethics Workshop, 3rd Edition. Boston, USA: Boston Academic Publishing / Flatworld Knowledge. pp. 349-376.
Genetic Privacy: Orthodoxy or Oxymoron?A. Sommerville & V. English - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (2):144-150.
Inaccuracy as a Privacy-Enhancing Tool.Gloria González Fuster - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (1):87-95.
Informational Privacy, Data Mining, and the Internet.Herman T. Tavani - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (2):137-145.
Data Collection, Counterterrorism and the Right to Privacy.Isaac Taylor - 2017 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 16 (3):326-346.
Protecting Health Privacy Even When Privacy is Lost.T. J. Kasperbauer - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (11):768-772.
Privacy, Secrecy and Security.Paul B. Thompson - 2001 - Ethics and Information Technology 3 (1):13-19.
Feminism, Democracy and the Right to Privacy.Annabelle Lever - 2005 - Minerva - An Internet Journal of Philosophy 9 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-02-15

Total views
75 ( #137,953 of 2,433,202 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #34,621 of 2,433,202 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes