Hastings Center Report 49 (6):22-31 (2019)

Authors
Carissa Véliz
Oxford University
Abstract
Population obesity and associated morbidities pose significant public health and economic burdens in the United Kingdom, United States, and globally. As a response, public health initiatives often seek to change individuals’ unhealthy behavior, with the dual aims of improving their health and conserving health care resources. One such initiative—taxes on sugar‐sweetened beverages (SSB)—has sparked considerable ethical debate. Prominent in the debate are arguments seeking to demonstrate the supposed impermissibility of SSB taxes and similar policies on the grounds that they interfere with individuals’ freedom and autonomy. Commentators have often assumed that a policy intended to restrict or change private individuals’ consumption behavior will necessarily curtail freedom and, as a corollary, will undermine individuals’ autonomy with respect to their consumption choices. Yet this assumption involves a conceptual mistake. To address the misunderstanding, it’s necessary to attend to the differences between negative liberty, freedom of options, and autonomy. Ultimately, concerns about negative liberty, freedom, and autonomy do not provide strong grounds for opposing SSB taxes.
Keywords autonomy  freedom  sugar taxes  negative liberty
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1002/hast.1067
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Against Autonomy: Justifying Coercive Paternalism.Sarah Conly - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (5):349-349.
Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality.Jon Elster - 1979 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 48 (4):650-651.
Is More Choice Better Than Less?Gerald Dworkin - 1982 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7 (1):47-61.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Children and Added Sugar: The Case for Restriction.Theodore Bach - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy:105-120.
If Sugar Is Addictive…What Does It Mean for the Law?Ashley Gearhardt, Michael Roberts & Marice Ashe - 2013 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (s1):46-49.
Death Is Just Not What It Used to Be.James N. Kirkpatrick, Kara D. Beasley & Arthur Caplan - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (1):7.
United States Taxes and Tax Policy.David G. Davies - 1986 - Cambridge University Press.
Sugar as a Reward for Hungry and Nonhungry Rats.Moncrieff Smith & Glenn C. Kinney - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (5):348.
What Diagnostic Devices Do: The Case of Blood Sugar Measurement.Annemaire Mol - 2000 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (1):9-22.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-12-09

Total views
36 ( #270,941 of 2,348,166 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #45,498 of 2,348,166 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes