Second order logic or set theory?

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 18 (1):91-121 (2012)
Abstract
We try to answer the question which is the “right” foundation of mathematics, second order logic or set theory. Since the former is usually thought of as a formal language and the latter as a first order theory, we have to rephrase the question. We formulate what we call the second order view and a competing set theory view, and then discuss the merits of both views. On the surface these two views seem to be in manifest conflict with each other. However, our conclusion is that it is very difficult to see any real difference between the two. We analyze a phenomenon we call internal categoricity which extends the familiar categoricity results of second order logic to Henkin models and show that set theory enjoys the same kind of internal categoricity. Thus the existence of non-standard models, which is usually taken as a property of first order set theory, and categoricity, which is usually taken as a property of second order axiomatizations, can coherently coexist when put into their proper context. We also take a fresh look at complete second order axiomatizations and give a hierarchy result for second order characterizable structures. Finally we consider the problem of existence in mathematics from both points of view and find that second order logic depends on what we call large domain assumptions, which come quite close to the meaning of the axioms of set theory.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2178/bsl/1327328440
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,803
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Reverse Mathematics and Peano Categoricity.Stephen G. Simpson & Keita Yokoyama - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (3):284-293.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Categoricity Theorems and Conceptions of Set.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (2):181-196.
Second-Order Logic and Foundations of Mathematics.Jouko Vaananen - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (4):504-520.
A Critical Appraisal of Second-Order Logic.Ignacio Jané - 1993 - History and Philosophy of Logic 14 (1):67-86.
Higher-Order Logic or Set Theory: A False Dilemma.S. Shapiro - 2012 - Philosophia Mathematica 20 (3):305-323.
Toward a Theory of Second-Order Consequence.Agustin Rayo & Gabriel Uzquiano - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (3):315-325.
Properties and the Interpretation of Second-Order Logic.B. Hale - 2013 - Philosophia Mathematica 21 (2):133-156.
Lógica Y Ontología.Ignacio Jané - 1988 - Theoria 4 (1):81-106.
Order Types of Ordinals in Models of Set Theory.John E. Hutchinson - 1976 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (2):489-502.
Added to PP index
2012-01-24

Total downloads
68 ( #80,273 of 2,202,776 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #61,822 of 2,202,776 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature