Second order logic or set theory?

Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 18 (1):91-121 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We try to answer the question which is the “right” foundation of mathematics, second order logic or set theory. Since the former is usually thought of as a formal language and the latter as a first order theory, we have to rephrase the question. We formulate what we call the second order view and a competing set theory view, and then discuss the merits of both views. On the surface these two views seem to be in manifest conflict with each other. However, our conclusion is that it is very difficult to see any real difference between the two. We analyze a phenomenon we call internal categoricity which extends the familiar categoricity results of second order logic to Henkin models and show that set theory enjoys the same kind of internal categoricity. Thus the existence of non-standard models, which is usually taken as a property of first order set theory, and categoricity, which is usually taken as a property of second order axiomatizations, can coherently coexist when put into their proper context. We also take a fresh look at complete second order axiomatizations and give a hierarchy result for second order characterizable structures. Finally we consider the problem of existence in mathematics from both points of view and find that second order logic depends on what we call large domain assumptions, which come quite close to the meaning of the axioms of set theory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,199

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Categoricity theorems and conceptions of set.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (2):181-196.
Second-order logic and foundations of mathematics.Jouko Väänänen - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (4):504-520.
A critical appraisal of second-order logic.Ignacio Jané - 1993 - History and Philosophy of Logic 14 (1):67-86.
Higher-Order Logic or Set Theory: A False Dilemma.S. Shapiro - 2012 - Philosophia Mathematica 20 (3):305-323.
Toward a Theory of Second-Order Consequence.Augustín Rayo & Gabriel Uzquiano - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (3):315-325.
Properties and the Interpretation of Second-Order Logic.B. Hale - 2013 - Philosophia Mathematica 21 (2):133-156.
Lógica Y ontología.Ignacio Jané - 1988 - Theoria 4 (1):81-106.
Order types of ordinals in models of set theory.John E. Hutchinson - 1976 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (2):489-502.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-24

Downloads
120 (#105,614)

6 months
6 (#132,607)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jouko A Vaananen
University of Helsinki

References found in this work

Set Theory.Keith J. Devlin - 1981 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 46 (4):876-877.
Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability.Hartley Rogers - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (1):141-146.
Isomorphism and higher order equivalence.M. Ajtai - 1979 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 16 (3):181.

Add more references