Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 18 (1):91-121 (2012)
AbstractWe try to answer the question which is the “right” foundation of mathematics, second order logic or set theory. Since the former is usually thought of as a formal language and the latter as a first order theory, we have to rephrase the question. We formulate what we call the second order view and a competing set theory view, and then discuss the merits of both views. On the surface these two views seem to be in manifest conflict with each other. However, our conclusion is that it is very difficult to see any real difference between the two. We analyze a phenomenon we call internal categoricity which extends the familiar categoricity results of second order logic to Henkin models and show that set theory enjoys the same kind of internal categoricity. Thus the existence of non-standard models, which is usually taken as a property of first order set theory, and categoricity, which is usually taken as a property of second order axiomatizations, can coherently coexist when put into their proper context. We also take a fresh look at complete second order axiomatizations and give a hierarchy result for second order characterizable structures. Finally we consider the problem of existence in mathematics from both points of view and find that second order logic depends on what we call large domain assumptions, which come quite close to the meaning of the axioms of set theory.
Similar books and articles
Categoricity theorems and conceptions of set.Gabriel Uzquiano - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (2):181-196.
Second-order logic and foundations of mathematics.Jouko Väänänen - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (4):504-520.
A critical appraisal of second-order logic.Ignacio Jané - 1993 - History and Philosophy of Logic 14 (1):67-86.
Higher-Order Logic or Set Theory: A False Dilemma.S. Shapiro - 2012 - Philosophia Mathematica 20 (3):305-323.
Beyond first-order logic: the historical interplay between mathematical logic and axiomatic set theory.Gregory H. Moore - 1980 - History and Philosophy of Logic 1 (1-2):95-137.
A proof of nominalism: An exercise in successful reduction in logic.Jaakko Hintikka - 2009 - In A. Hieke & H. Leitgeb (eds.), Reduction, Abstraction, Analysis. Ontos.
Toward a Theory of Second-Order Consequence.Augustín Rayo & Gabriel Uzquiano - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (3):315-325.
Interpreting second-order logic in the monadic theory of order.Yuri Gurevich & Saharon Shelah - 1983 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (3):816-828.
Properties and the Interpretation of Second-Order Logic.B. Hale - 2013 - Philosophia Mathematica 21 (2):133-156.
On plural reference and elementary set theory.Helen Morris Cartwright - 1993 - Synthese 96 (2):201 - 254.
Order types of ordinals in models of set theory.John E. Hutchinson - 1976 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 41 (2):489-502.
Relating first-order set theories and elementary toposes.Steve Awodey, Carsten Butz & Alex Simpson - 2007 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 13 (3):340-358.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Structure and Categoricity: Determinacy of Reference and Truth Value in the Philosophy of Mathematics.Tim Button & Sean Walsh - 2016 - Philosophia Mathematica 24 (3):283-307.
Internal Categoricity in Arithmetic and Set Theory.Jouko Väänänen & Tong Wang - 2015 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 56 (1):121-134.
The Dividing Line Methodology: Model Theory Motivating Set Theory.John T. Baldwin - 2021 - Theoria 87 (2):361-393.
Reverse mathematics and Peano categoricity.Stephen G. Simpson & Keita Yokoyama - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (3):284-293.
References found in this work
Completeness and Categoricity. Part I: Nineteenth-century Axiomatics to Twentieth-century Metalogic.Steve Awodey & Erich H. Reck - 2002 - History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (1):1-30.
Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability.Hartley Rogers - 1971 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 36 (1):141-146.