Environmental philosophy after the end of nature
Environmental Ethics 24 (1):23-39 (2002)
Abstract
I call for “postnaturalism” in environmental philosophy—for an environmental philosophy that no longer employs the concept nature. First, the term is too ambiguous and philosophically dangerous and, second, McKibben and others who argue that nature has already ended are probably right—except that perhaps nature has always already ended. Poststructuralism, environmental history, and recent science studies all point in the same direction: the world we inhabit is always already one transformed by human practices. Environmental questions are social and political ones, to be answered by us and not by nature. Many will worry that this conclusion leads to environmentally pernicious consequences, and to problems of relativism and idealism, but I argue that it does not. Practices are real, not ideal, and not all practices are equal: those that acknowledge human responsibility for transforming the world are preferable to those that don’t. Environmental harm results when we do not recognize our own responsibility for the world our practices createAuthor's Profile
ISBN(s)
0163-4275
DOI
10.2979/ete.2007.12.2.128
My notes
Similar books and articles
The justification of an environmental ethic.Evelyn B. Pluhar - 1983 - Environmental Ethics 5 (1):47-61.
Environmental Ethics and the Social Construction of Nature.Anna Peterson - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (4):339-357.
Is the Concept of Nature Dispensable?Robin Attfield - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5 (25):59-63.
Environmental ethics and the built environment.Roger J. H. King - 2000 - Environmental Ethics 22 (2):115-131.
On humans and environment: The role of consciousness in environmental problems. [REVIEW]Jerry Williams & Shaun Parkman - 2003 - Human Studies 26 (4):449-460.
An Invitation to Environmental Sociology.Michael Bell - 2011 - Thousand Oaks, Califorinia: Pine Forge Press.
The Paradox of Environmental Ethics: Nietzsche’s View of Nature and the Wild.Martin Drenthen - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (2):163-175.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
96 (#130,197)
6 months
3 (#224,882)
2009-01-28
Downloads
96 (#130,197)
6 months
3 (#224,882)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Considering De-Extinction: Zombie Arguments and the Walking (And Flying and Swimming) Dead.Eric Katz - 2022 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 25 (2):81-103.
Synthetic Biology: Drawing a Line in Darwin's Sand.Christopher J. Preston - 2008 - Environmental Values 17 (1):23-39.
Further Adventures in the Case against Restoration.Eric Katz - 2012 - Environmental Ethics 34 (1):67-97.
What Does Environmental Protection Protect?Mark Sagoff - 2013 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 16 (3):239-257.
Beyond the End of Nature: SRM and Two Tales of Artificity for the Anthropocene.Christopher J. Preston - 2012 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 15 (2):188 - 201.