Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (2):94-96 (2014)

Authors
Kristin Voigt
McGill University
Abstract
The need for rationing of clinical services and medical resources is a crucial issue facing healthcare systems. On most accounts, the demand for medical services vastly exceeds what can be provided on limited budgets, requiring difficult decisions about which services should and should not be provided to patients, whether patients might have to bear some of the cost of the services they use, and on what basis rationing decisions should be made. At the same time, we know that healthcare systems are far from perfectly efficient; some of the expenditures of healthcare systems are wasteful and bring no benefits at all to patients. In light of the evidence of such inefficiencies within healthcare systems, it may seem problematic to insist on the importance of rationing: can it really be appropriate to deny patients beneficial services while inefficiencies remain within the system?1This is the question Strech and Danis take on in their paper, ‘How can bedside rationing be justified despite coexisting inefficiency? The need for “benchmarks of efficiency”’. As they highlight, the evidence about inefficiencies within the healthcare system is sometimes taken to undermine the legitimacy of rationing. Their response focuses on the implications of particular clinicians’ involvement in both inefficient decisions and bedside rationing: if clinicians cause or contribute to inefficiencies in the system—for example by prescribing more expensive ‘brand name’ medication instead of equally effective but cheaper generic drugs—is it legitimate for them also to make, or be involved in, rationing decisions? Strech and Danis argue that even though no healthcare system can be fully efficient, clinicians must make ‘sufficient’ efforts to reduce inefficiencies within their own realm of decision-making if their engagement in rationing decisions is to be legitimate. They offer a set of ‘benchmarks’ against which we can judge whether or not such efforts should …
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2012-101236
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,342
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Should Physicians Be Gatekeepers of Medical Resources?M. C. Weinstein - 2001 - Journal of Medical Ethics 27 (4):268-274.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Just Caring: Health Reform and Health Care Rationing.Leonard M. Fleck - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (5):435-443.
The Problems with Rule-Based Rationing.Mark A. Hall - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (4):315-332.
Ethics and Public Health Emergencies: Rationing Vaccines.Matthew K. Wynia - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (6):4 – 7.
Rational Rationing?B. Brecher - 2008 - Clinical Ethics 3 (2):53-54.
How Do Patients Know?Rebecca Kukla - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (5):27-35.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-17

Total views
16 ( #582,896 of 2,326,057 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #650,227 of 2,326,057 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes