Electoral Quid Pro Quo: A Defence of Barter Markets in Votes

Journal of Applied Philosophy 36 (5):769-784 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this article I aim to provide the first normative discussion of barter voting markets, namely markets which allow the trading of votes on issues/elections for votes on other issues/elections. The article is framed within the wider literature on the legal permissibility of vote buying, with a particular focus on the recent debate between Christopher Freiman and James Stacey Taylor. I argue that while Taylor's objections successfully defeat Freiman's case in favour of standard voting markets, they are unable to also defeat the type of voting markets outlined here. Furthermore, I argue that there are at least two plausible prima facie reasons in favour of barter voting markets, grounded in their capacity to contribute to the alleviation of injustice for systematically disadvantaged socio‐economic groups and to their capacity to reduce one form of bad voting, i.e. voting from ignorance.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,038

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vote Markets.Christopher Freiman - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (4):759-774.
The Effect of Dual Candidacy on Voting Decisions.Yoichi Hizen - 2006 - Japanese Journal of Political Science 7 (3):289-306.
Autonomy, Vote Buying, and Constraining Options.James Stacey Taylor - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 34 (5):711-723.
Don’t Change the Subject.Andrew Stark - 1997 - Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (3):93-116.
Don’t Change the Subject.Andrew Stark - 1997 - Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (3):93-116.


Added to PP

14 (#862,846)

6 months
3 (#503,027)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexandru Volacu
Bucharest Center for Political Theory

References found in this work

Polluting the Polls: When Citizens Should Not Vote.Jason Brennan - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (4):535-549.

Add more references