Estetika 55 (1):89-111 (2018)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
In this essay, I defend a Wollheimian account of a twofold picture perception. While I agree with Wollheim’s objectors that a picture involves three layers that qualify a picture in its complexity -- its vehicle, what is seen in it, and its subject --, I argue that the third layer does not involve perception, even indirectly: what is seen in a picture constrains its subject to be a subject of a certain kind, yet it does not force the latter to be pictorially perceived, not even indirectly. So, even if a picture is three-layered, pictorial experience remains a twofold experience, as Wollheim claimed. Neither the proponents of threefoldness nor Wollheim himself, however, have convincingly explained how the experience really is a perceptual experience. My Wollheimian account thus aims to reconceive the pictorial experience in properly perceptual terms.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2018 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Seeing‐As in the Light of Vision Science.Ned Block - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (1):560-572.
Criteria, Defeasibility, and Knowledge.John McDowell - 1983 - In Proceedings of the British Academy, Volume 68: 1982. Oxford University Press. pp. 455-79.
Visual Feeling of Presence.Gabriele Ferretti - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (S1):112-136.
View all 23 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Substitution by Image: The Very Idea.Jakub Stejskal - 2019 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 77 (1):55-66.
Different Kinds of Fusion Experiences.Alberto Voltolini - 2020 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 11 (1):203-222.
Similar books and articles
Pictorial Experience: Not so Special After All.Alon Chasid - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 171 (3):471-491.
Pictorial Aesthetics and Two Kinds of Inflected Seeing-In.Giulia Martina - 2016 - Estetika 53 (1):74-92.
Pictorial Experience and Seeing.Michael Newall - 2009 - British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (2):129-141.
Is Twofoldness Necessary for Representational Seeing?Bence Nanay - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):248-257.
The Naturalism of Pictorial Representation.Douglas John Dempster - 1983 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Why, as Responsible for Figurativity, Seeing-in Can Only Be Inflected Seeing-In.Alberto Voltolini - 2015 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (3):651-667.
The Seeing-in Theory of Depiction and the Psychophysics of Picture Perception.Anne Tüscher - unknown
How to Reconcile Seeing-As with Seeing-In (with Mimetic Purposes in Mind). Voltolini - 2012 - In G. Currie, P. Kot’Atko & M. Pokorny (eds.), Rivista di Estetica. College Publications. pp. 99-113.
Gombrich and the Duck-Rabbit.Robert Eamon Briscoe - 2018 - In Michael Beaney (ed.), Aspect Perception After Wittgenstein: Seeing-as and Novelty. Routledge. pp. 49-88.
Imaginatively‐Colored Perception: Walton on Pictorial Experience.Alon Chasid - 2016 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 54 (1):27-47.
Seeing-In as Aspect Perception.Fabian Dorsch - 2016 - In Gary Kemp & Gabriele Mras (eds.), Wollheim, Wittgenstein, and Pictorial Representation: Seeing-as and Seeing-in. Routledge.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2018-03-28
Total views
25 ( #421,422 of 2,421,247 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #544,098 of 2,421,247 )
2018-03-28
Total views
25 ( #421,422 of 2,421,247 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #544,098 of 2,421,247 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads