Authors
Mario Von Der Ruhr
Swansea University
Abstract
In his 1985 book on philosophy and atheism, the Canadian thinker Kai Nielsen, a prolific writer on the subject, wonders why the philosophy of religion is ‘so boring’, and concludes that it must be ‘because the case for atheism is so strong that it is difficult to work up much enthusiasm for the topic.’ Indeed, Nielsen even regards most of the contemporary arguments for atheism as little more than ‘mopping up operations after the Enlightenment’ which, on the whole, add little to the socio-anthropological and socio-psychological accounts of religion provided by thinkers like Feuerbach, Marx and Freud, as any ‘reasonable person informed by modernity’ will readily acknowledge. On this view, the answer to Kant's question – ‘What may we hope?’ – does not gesture towards a resurrection and personal immortality, but instead to the death of religious discourse itself: I think, and indeed hope, that God-talk, and religious discourse more generally, is, or at least should be, dying out in the West, or more generally in a world that has felt the force of a Weberian disenchantment of the world. This sense that religious convictions are no longer a live option is something which people who think of themselves as either modernists or post-modernists very often tend to have.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1358246111000130
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,855
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Wittgensteinian Fideism?Kai Nielsen & D. Z. Phillips - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (1):51-55.
Wittgensteinian Fideism.Kai Nielsen - 1982 - In Steven M. Cahn & David Shatz (eds.), International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press. pp. 191-.
Gravity and Grace.Simone Weil - 1952 - New York: Putnam.
Gravity and Grace.Simone Weil - 1953 - Philosophy 28 (106):276-278.
Waiting for God.Simone Weil - 1951 - Harpercollins.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Atheisms and the Purification of Faith.Mikel Burley - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 75 (4):319-331.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kai Nielsen’s Philosophy & Atheism.Hendrik Hart - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):334-346.
Atheisms and the Purification of Faith.Mikel Burley - 2014 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 75 (4):319-331.
Arguments for Atheism.Graham Oppy - 2013 - In Stephen Bullivant & Michael Ruse (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford University Press. pp. 53.
Taking Suspicion Seriously.Merold Westphal - 1987 - Faith and Philosophy 4 (1):26-42.
Why I Don't Believe in the New Atheism.Tom Flynn - 2010 - Free Inquiry 30 (3):7-43.
An Apology for the “New Atheism”.Andrew Johnson - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (1):5-28.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-07-29

Total views
62 ( #151,970 of 2,342,675 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #149,245 of 2,342,675 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes