Miracles are not violations of the laws of nature because laws do not entail regularities


Authors
Daniel von Wachter
International Academy of Philosophy In The Principality of Liechtenstein
Abstract
Some have tried to make miracles compatible with the laws of nature by re-defining them as something other than interventions. By contrast, this article argues that although miracles are divine interventions, they are not violations of the laws of nature. Miracles are also not exceptions to the laws, nor do the laws not apply to them. The laws never have exceptions; they never are violated or suspended, are necessary and unchangeable, and apply also to divine interventions. We need to reconsider not miracles but laws. The main claim of this article is that laws of nature do not entail regularities, and that therefore miracles do not violate the laws. We need a new theory of the laws of nature: the tendency theory.
Keywords miracles  laws of nature
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Counterfactuals.David Kellogg Lewis - 1973 - Cambridge, MA, USA: Blackwell.
How the Laws of Physics Lie.Nancy Cartwright - 1983 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Scientific Essentialism.Brian Ellis - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 25 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Miracles and Violations of Laws of Nature.Daniel Saudek - 2017 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 9 (1):109--123.
Miracles: Metaphysics and Modality.Stephen Mumford - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (2):191-202.
Against Miracles as Law-Violations: A Neo-Aristotelian Approach.Archer Joel - 2015 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (4):83--98.
Lockean Essentialism and the Possibility of Miracles.Nathan Rockwood - 2018 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 56 (2):293-310.
Reconceiving Miracles.James E. Gilman - 1989 - Religious Studies 25 (4):477 - 487.
Miracles and the Laws of Nature.Robert A. Larmer - 1985 - Dialogue 24 (2):227 - 235.
On Supernatural Miracles and Laws of Nature.Joseph Berkovitz - 2012 - Toronto Journal of Theology 28 (1):145-152.
Miracles.Paul Fitzgerald - 1985 - Philosophical Forum 17 (1):48 - 64.
Newtonian Science, Miracles, and the Laws of Nature.Peter Harrison - 1995 - Journal of the History of Ideas 56 (4):531 - 553.
Can Kantian Laws Be Broken? Kant on Miracles.Andrew Chignell - 2014 - Res Philosophica 91 (1):103-121.
Normative and Natural Laws.Stephen Mumford - 2000 - Philosophy 75 (2):265-282.
Miracles and Laws of Nature.Tim Mawson - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (1):33-58.
Against 'Against Miracles'.Robert Larmer - 1988 - Sophia 27 (1):20 - 25.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-08-27

Total views
22 ( #513,421 of 2,508,119 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,711 of 2,508,119 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes