Robin Hood Justice: Why Robin Hood Took from the Rich and Gave to the Poor (and We Should Too)

Public Affairs Quarterly 3 (2) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The legend of Robin Hood exemplifies a distinct concern of justice neglected by theorists: the distributive results of systemic injustices. Robin Hood’s redistributive activities are justified by the principle that the distributive results of systemic injustices are unjust and should be corrected. This principle has relevance beyond the legend: since current inequalities in the US are results of systemic injustices, the US has good reason to take from the rich and give to the poor.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-28

Downloads
1,098 (#958)

6 months
4,749 (#1,223)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeppe von Platz
University of Richmond

Citations of this work

The Philosophical Core of Effective Altruism.Brian Berkey - 2021 - Journal of Social Philosophy 52 (1):93-115.
Tracking Eudaimonia.Paul Bloomfield - 2018 - Philosophy, Theory, and Practice in Biology 10 (2).
‘Beneath This Mask There is More Than Flesh, Beneath This Mask There is an Idea’: Anonymous as the (Super)heroes of the Internet?Sofia Alexopoulou & Antonia Pavli - 2019 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 34 (1):237-264.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Equality or Priority?Derek Parfit - 2001 - In John Harris (ed.), Bioethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 81-125.
Equality as a moral ideal.Harry Frankfurt - 1987 - Ethics 98 (1):21-43.
Superseding historic injustice.Jeremy Waldron - 1992 - Ethics 103 (1):4-28.
Where the Action Is: On the Site of Distributive Justice.G. A. Cohen - 1997 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 26 (1):3-30.
Institutions and the Demands of Justice.Liam B. Murphy - 1998 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (4):251-291.

View all 13 references / Add more references