Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (3):360–376 (2006)
AbstractDriven by a sharp increase in claims for reparations, reparative justice has become a topic of academic debate. To some extent this debate has been marred by a failure to realize the complexity of reparative justice. In this essay we try to amend this shortcoming. We do this by developing a taxonomy of different kinds of wrongs that can underwrite claims to reparations. We identify four kinds of wrongs: entitlement violations, unjust exclusions from an otherwise acceptable system of entitlements, and two kinds where a social practice systematically fails to embody an acceptable system of entitlements. In deliberation about what is required to repair a historical injustice the weight of backward- and forward-looking considerations is a function of the distinctive features of the injustice in question. Hence, the first step in adjudicating claims for reparation is to identify what kind of wrong the claim arises from. From the taxonomy of wrongs we are thus able to construct what we call the Field of Reparative Justice, which illustrates how the structure of deliberation for reparative justice tracks the distinctive features of different kinds of wrongs.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Responsibility and Global Justice: A Social Connection Model.Iris Marion Young - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (1):102-130.
Redressing Historic Injustice.Jeremy Waldron - 2002 - University of Toronto Law Journal 52 (1):135-60.
Coming to Terms with Our Past, Part II: On the Morality and Politics of Reparations for Slavery.Thomas McCarthy - 2004 - Political Theory 32 (6):750-772.
Responsibility for Past Injustice: How to Shift the Burden.Chandran Kukathas - 2003 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 2 (2):165-190.
Similar books and articles
Dilemmas of Diversity: A New Paradigm of Integrating Diversity.Charles Hampden-Turner & Ginger Chih - 2010 - World Futures 66 (3-4):192 – 218.
Historical Justice in International Perspective: How Societies Are Trying to Right the Wrongs of the Past.Manfred Berg & Bernd Schaefer (eds.) - 2009 - Cambridge University Press.
Reconciling Historical Injustices: Deliberative Democracy and the Politics of Reconciliation. [REVIEW]Bashir Bashir - 2012 - Res Publica 18 (2):127-143.
Unity and Diversity. A Structural Analysis of “And”. Systematic Research Into the Concept of Unity and Diversity in Plato, Fichte, Hegel, as Well as in Modern Times.Norbert Herold - 1984 - Philosophy and History 17 (2):110-113.
Structural Realism: Continuity and its Limits.Ioannis Votsis - 2009 - In Alisa Bokulich & Peter Bokulich (eds.), Scientific Structuralism. Springer Science+Business Media. pp. 105--117.
Getting to the Root of Gender Inequality: Structural Injustice and Political Responsibility.Serena Parekh - 2011 - Hypatia 26 (4):672-689.
Reproductive Tourism and the Quest for Global Gender Justice.Anne Donchin - 2010 - Bioethics 24 (7):323-332.