Balancing small against large burdens

Behavioural Public Policy 2 (1):125-142 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Common principles for resource allocation in health care can prioritize the alleviation of small health burdens over lifesaving treatment. I argue that there is some evidence that these principles are at odds with a sizable share of public opinion, which holds that saving a life should take priority over any number of cures for minor ailments. I propose two possible explanations for this opinion, one debunking and one vindicatory. I also outline how well-designed surveys and moral inquiry could help decide between them. Finally, I consider how priority-setting principles could be adjusted if the view that saving a life always trumps alleviating small burdens were vindicated.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

447 (#46,086)

6 months
77 (#69,046)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alex Voorhoeve
London School of Economics