Prioriteit voor patienten met een lagere levenskwaliteit

Filosofie En Praktijk 31:40-51 (2010)
Authors
Alex Voorhoeve
London School of Economics
Abstract
This paper critically analyses the priority-setting rules used by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the UK and proposed by the Netherlands' Council on Public Health and Health Care (RVZ). It argues that neither gives proper weight to improving the lot of those who are worse off than others.
Keywords Equality  Fair distribution in health care
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Justice, Health, and Healthcare.Norman Daniels - 2001 - American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):2 – 16.
Rawlsian Justice and a Human Right to Health Care.John C. Moskop - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (4):329-338.
Equality Versus Priority: A Misleading Distinction.Daniel M. Hausman - 2015 - Economics and Philosophy 31 (2):229-238.
How Compatible Are Liberty and Equality in Structuring a Health Care System?Paul T. Menzel - 2003 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (3):281 – 306.
Opportunity and Health Care: Criticisms and Suggestions.Lawrence Stern - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (4):339-361.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-10-25

Total views
99 ( #68,541 of 2,313,444 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #59,659 of 2,313,444 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature