In David Sobel, Peter Vallentyne & Steven Wall (eds.), Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, Vol 4. Oxford University Press. pp. 167-191 (2018)
AbstractI critically examine a common liberal egalitarian view about the justification for, and proper content of, mandatory health insurance. This view holds that a mandate is justified because it is the best way to ensure that those in poor health gain health insurance on equitable terms. It also holds that a government should mandate what a representative prudent individual would purchase for themselves if they were placed in fair conditions of choice. I argue that this common justification for a mandate is incomplete. A further reason for mandated insurance is that it helps secure social egalitarian public goods that would be underprovided if insurance were optional. I also argue that rather than mandating what a representative individual would choose for themselves, we should design the mandatory package by appealing to a pluralistic egalitarian view, which cares about improving people’s well-being, reducing unfair inequality, and maintaining egalitarian social relations.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Citations of this work
Morally Permissible Risk Imposition and Liability to Defensive Harm.Susanne Burri - 2020 - Law and Philosophy 39 (4):381-408.
Similar books and articles
The Constitutionality of Mandates to Purchase Health Insurance.Mark A. Hall - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (s2):38-50.
New Directions for Health Insurance Design: Implications for Public Health Policy and Practice.Sara Rosenbaum - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (s4):94-103.
The Massachusetts Health Plan, Individual Mandates, and the Neutrality of the Liberal State.D. Murray - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (5):466-483.
The Moral Duty to Buy Health Insurance.Tina Rulli, Ezekiel Emanuel & David Wendler - 2012 - Journal of the American Medical Association 308 (2):137-138.
John Stuart Mill on Health Care Reform.Sean Donaghue Johnston - 2011 - Social Philosophy Today 27:63-74.
New Directions in Health Insurance Design: Implications for Public Policy and Practice.Karen Pollitz, Donna Imhoff, Charles Scott & Sara Rosenbaum - 2003 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 31 (s4):60-62.
The Individual Mandate: Implications for Public Health Law.Wendy E. Parmet - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):401-413.
Equitable Taxation and the Provision of Health Insurance Subsidies.Elizabeth Plummer Donald R. Nichols - 2011 - Business and Society Review 116 (4):435-466.
Necessary Health Care and Basic Needs: Health Insurance Plans and Essential Benefits. [REVIEW]Andrew Ward & Pamela Jo Johnson - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (4):355-371.
Health Care Sharing Ministries and Their Exemption From the Individual Mandate of the Affordable Care Act.Charlene Galarneau - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (2):269-282.
Oregon Health Plan: Ration or Reason.Paige R. Sipes-Metzler - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (4):305-314.
Public Health Insurance Under a Nonbenevolent State.P. Lemieux - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (5):416-426.
Luck Egalitarianism, Universal Health Care, and Non-Responsibility-Based Reasons for Responsibilization.Martin Marchman Andersen & Morten Ebbe Juul Nielsen - 2015 - Res Publica 21 (2):201-216.