Should moral commitments be articulated? An introduction

International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 84 (5):303-308 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This Special Issue questions a basic assumption in thinking about morality: the idea that the explicit articulation of moral commitments that usually remain implicit is the basis par excellence for dialogue and rapprochement between people of opposing views. Nicholas Adams shows in the main article of this Special Issue that there is a paradox behind this assumption concerning ethics itself: articulating moral commitments may end up undermining them. It inherently stands in tension with forms of life as people actually inhabit them. Adams associates this basic paradox of ethics with the problem of forced articulation in particular discursive regimes, such as interreligious dialogue. The practice of Scriptural Reasoning is introduced as an alternative mode of dialogue that is less vulnerable to the distortions of articulation. The five response articles (by Petruschka Schaafsma, Ariën Voogt, Rob Compaijen, Dominique Gosewisch, and Sophia Höff) address aspects of Adams’ challenge to articulation in relation to morality, rather than the setting of interreligious engagement. They point out the value of articulation in spite of its inherent imperfection, or constructively elaborate on how to deal with the paradox of ethics as analyzed by Adams. Finally, Adams responds by addressing the concerns of these replies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Commitment and reflection in moral life.Rob Compaijen - 2023 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 84 (5):340-346.
Obstacles to moral articulation in interreligious engagement.Nicholas Adams - 2023 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 84 (5):309-325.
The dialectic of articulation: a Hegelian response to Adams.Ariën Voogt - 2023 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 84 (5):333-339.
Thinking with Walter Benjamin on language and Scriptural Reasoning.Sophia Höff - 2023 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 84 (5):353-359.
COP20's Ethical Fallout: The Perils of Principles Without Dialogue.Hugh Breakey - 2015 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 18 (2):155-168.
Verdad y Diálogo Interreligioso.Jorge Ayala - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 45:411-417.
Perfect imperfection: articulation in moral formation.Dominique A. Gosewisch - 2023 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 84 (5):347-352.
Monastic Interreligious Dialogue: Dialogue at the Level of Spiritual Practice and Experience.William Skudlarek O. S. B. - 2018 - In Michael Amaladoss S. J., Roberto Catalano, Francis X. Clooney S. J., Archbishop Michael L. Fitzgerald, Richard Girardin, Roger Haight S. J., Sallie B. King, Vladimir Latinovic, Leo D. Lefebure, Archbishop Felix Machado, Gerard Mannion, Alexander E. Massad, Sandra Mazzolini, Dawn M. Nothwehr O. S. F., John T. Pawlikowski O. S. M., Peter C. Phan, Jonathan Ray, William Skudlarek O. S. B., Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, Jason Welle O. F. M. & Taraneh R. Wilkinson (eds.), Catholicism Engaging Other Faiths: Vatican Ii and its Impact. Springer Verlag. pp. 229-247.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-22

Downloads
7 (#1,393,046)

6 months
7 (#440,443)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Obstacles to moral articulation in interreligious engagement.Nicholas Adams - 2023 - International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 84 (5):309-325.

Add more references