The belief in innate talent and its implications for distributive justice

Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (8):819-832 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Although the commonly accepted view is that there are such things as natural talents, more than 20 years of research suggests the opposite. What passes for talented is attributable to a combination of social and environmental factors. If the current research on this topic holds true, then there are implications not only for various theories of distributive justice, but there are also serious implication for real world distributions. In this article I will argue that talent is not innate and that our belief in its innateness has serious theoretical and practical implications for distributive justice. Many of these implications can be seen in the ways resources and opportunities are distributed; particularly in the way they affect distributions to children.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Talent Identification and Talent Nurture: The Indian Story.Aniket Sule - 2019 - In Rekha Koul, Geeta Verma & Vanashri Nargund-Joshi (eds.), Science Education in India: Philosophical, Historical, and Contemporary Conversations. Springer Singapore. pp. 163-177.
Against selection: Educational justice and the ascription of talent.Johannes Giesinger - 2021 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 53 (8):789-798.
Natural born talents undiscovered.Michael J. A. Howe, Jane W. Davidson & John A. Sloboda - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):432-437.
Corrective vs. Distributive Justice: the Case of Apologies.Andrew I. Cohen - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (3):663-677.
Attributed talent is a powerful myth.Clemens Tesch-Römer - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):427-427.
Equality versus Priority.Michael Otsuka & Alex Voorhoeve - 2018 - In Serena Olsaretti (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 65-85.
Fruitless polarities.Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):411-411.
Gender.Anca Gheaus - 2018 - In Serena Olsaretti (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Distributive Justice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 389-414.
A Vindication of Distributive Justice.Stefan Gosepath - 2019 - Yearbook for Eastern and Western Philosophy 2019 (4):5-19.


Added to PP

21 (#720,615)

6 months
5 (#638,139)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Vopat
Youngstown State University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references