Cambridge University Press (2006)
Abstract |
A Theory of Argument is an advanced textbook intended for students in philosophy, communications studies and linguistics who have completed at least one course in argumentation theory, information logic, critical thinking or formal logic. Containing nearly 400 exercises, Mark Vorobej develops a novel approach to argument interpretation and evaluation. One of the key themes of the book is that we cannot succeed in distinguishing good argument from bad arguments until we learn to listen carefully to others. Part I develops a relativistic account of argument cogency that allows for rational disagreement. Part II offers a comprehensive and rigorous account of argument diagramming. Hybrid arguments are contrasted with linked and convergent arguments, and a novel technique is introduced for graphically recording disagreements with authorial claims.
|
Keywords | Reasoning |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2009 |
Buy this book | Amazon page |
Call number | BC177.V59 2006 |
ISBN(s) | 9780511498879 9780521670258 052167025X 0521783704 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
A Probabilistic Analysis of Argument Cogency.David Godden & Frank Zenker - 2018 - Synthese 195 (4):1715-1740.
Investigating the Shared Background Required for Argument: A Critique of Fogelin's Thesis on Deep Disagreement.Dana Phillips - 2008 - Informal Logic 28 (2):86-101.
Trust, Relevance, and Arguments.Fabio Paglieri & Cristiano Castelfranchi - 2014 - Argument and Computation 5 (2-3):216-236.
A Verisimilitudinarian Analysis of the Linda Paradox.Gustavo Cevolani, Vincenzo Crupi & Roberto Festa - 2012 - VII Conference of the Spanish Society for Logic, Methodology and Philosphy of Science.
Hermeneutics, Logic and Reconstruction.Friedrich Reinmuth - 2014 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 17 (1):152-190.
View all 6 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Argument. Appreciation! Argument-Criticism: The "Aesthetics" of Informal Logic.Joel Rudinow - 1991 - Informal Logic 13 (2).
Towards Formal Representation and Evaluation of Arguments.Marcin Selinger - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (3):379-393.
Argument and Its Uses (OSSA 2005 Keynote Address).J. Anthony Blair - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (2):137-151.
Good Reasons for Better Arguments: An Introduction to the Skills and Values of Critical Thinking.Jerome E. Bickenbach & Jacqueline M. Davies - 1996 - Broadview Press.
The Epistemological Theory of Argument--How and Why?Christoph Lumer - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (3):213-243.
How to Improve the Convergent Argument Calculation.Alexander V. Tyaglo - 2002 - Informal Logic 22 (1).
Anselm's Argumentum and the Early Medieval Theory of Argument.Toivo Holopainen - 2007 - Vivarium 45 (1):1-29.
Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments: A Theory of Argument Structure.James B. Freeman - 1991 - Foris Publications.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
38 ( #265,183 of 2,402,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,323 of 2,402,061 )
2009-01-28
Total views
38 ( #265,183 of 2,402,061 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,323 of 2,402,061 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads