Informal Logic 14 (2) (1992)

Abstract
This paper defends the view that the classification of an argument as being deductive ought to rest exclusively upon psychological considerations; specifically, upon whether the argument's author holds certain beliefs. This account is justified on theoretical and pedagogical grounds, and situated within a general taxonomy of competing proposals. Epistemological difficulties involved in the application of psychological definitions are recognized but claimed to be ineliminable from the praetice of argumentation. The paper concludes by discussing embryonic arguments where the author's relevant beliefs are not sufficiently fine-grained so as to accord the argument deductive or inductive status
Keywords deductive argument, necessitation, embryonic argument, the personal point of view
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,856
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Choice and Chance.Brian Skyrms - 1966 - Belmont, Calif., Dickenson Pub. Co..
Introduction to Logic.Leonard Linsky - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (2):330.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
24 ( #429,544 of 2,401,712 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,964 of 2,401,712 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes