Informal Logic 17 (2) (1995)

Abstract
Sometimes logical support for a conclusion is provided exclusively by premises which are independently relevant to that conclusion. At other times, support is provided exclusively by independently irrelevant premises. On still other occasions, relevant and irrelevant premises may collectively offer a distinctive pattern of support. This paper provides a rigorous account of some of these differences in terms of a tripartite classification of convergent, linked and hybrid arguments. These various arguments are defined, diagrammed, and some of their logical properties are explored
Keywords relevance, simple arguments, convergent arguments, linked arguments, hybrid arguments, linked sets, argument diagrams, supplementation, vulnerability, hypervulnerability
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 55,856
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Walton on Argument Structure.G. C. Goddu - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):5-26.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The TRUE Test of Linkage.Mark Vorobej - 1994 - Informal Logic 16 (3):147-157.
Rules for Plausible Reasoning.Douglas Walton - 1992 - Informal Logic 14 (1).
Self-Referential Arguments in Philosophy.Elke Brendel - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):177-197.
The Possibility of Inductive Moral Arguments.Mark T. Nelson - 2006 - Philosophical Papers 35 (2):231-246.
Mapping the Structure of Debate.Jeffrey Yoshimi - 2004 - Informal Logic 24 (1):1-22.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-24

Total views
18 ( #557,767 of 2,401,716 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #551,964 of 2,401,716 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes